USS communications: updates, messages and responses

SECTION ONE: Messages to USS members

Messages sent to all USS members (and, when appropriate, to all eligible members) from members of the University.

Message to all USS members and to all staff eligible to join the USS pension scheme  

Dear colleagues, 

Happy New Year to you all. I am delighted to be writing with good news about the USS pension scheme – with contributions lowering and benefits returning. 

The USS Trustees met on 19 December to finalise the 2023 valuation of the scheme. The Trustees have now confirmed the following changes to contributions and benefits for USS members: 

Contributions 

The proposed lower contribution rates – 6.1% for members (previously 9.8%) and 14.5% for employers (previously 21.6%) commenced from 1 January 2024.  
This means that you will notice a decrease in the amount you pay into your USS pension from your January pay. As an illustration, someone earning £35k a year will see their annual contribution reduce from £3,430 before tax to £2,135 before tax. 

Benefits – a return to the pre-April 2022 benefit structure 

Currently you get 1/85 of salary (up to the salary threshold) in defined benefit pension each year and 3/85 of salary as a lump sum on retirement. This will increase to 1/75 of salary for pension benefits and 3/75 of salary for the lump sum respectively (for salary up to the salary threshold).  

It is also anticipated that the salary threshold will be raised, and the exact figure will be confirmed in the next few weeks. It is likely to move from £41,004 to over £70,000 with the change coming into effect from 1 April 2024. 

This means if your salary is higher than the current salary threshold (£41,004), you’ll start building up a greater proportion of defined benefits in the Retirement Income Builder (the defined benefit part) and less savings in the Investment Builder (the defined contribution part). If your salary is below the current salary threshold, the increase to the salary threshold will not impact your benefits.  
More information is available from the USS website. 

More information is available from the USS website

Benefits uplift  

In order to make up for the gap in the benefits accrued since 2022, there will be a one-off pension uplift of £215 applied to benefits built up by all eligible members between 1 April 2022 and 31 March 2024, together with an associated £645 retirement lump sum. Anyone eligible opting into (or re-joining) the scheme before 31 March 2024 will benefit from this uplift.

A helpful Q&A about the uplift is available from the USS website


These are important and positive changes. If you are not currently in the USS scheme, I hope this may prompt you to consider your options. Our Pensions team members (link behind SSO) are always available to help explain details of the scheme, and the University’s USS Working Group are happy to answer your questions via our USS Hub (link behind SSO). 

Why these changes are happening

 All USS members and employers were consulted on these changes, which conclude the 2023 valuation. The changes are a result of the much-improved financial position of the scheme, thanks to significant changes in the economy since the 2020 valuation was finalised. Oxford joined other employers to affirm support for the proposed package as a fair and balanced solution to the valuation. 

Responding to your feedback 

I would like to take this opportunity to thank the 583 people who took the time to complete the most recent short USS survey we sent out in November, as well as those completing the other surveys sent out earlier in 2023.  

The recent Back to Basics webinar on retirement options, with Pensions Manager Alan Cunningham, was delivered in response to requests received via your survey responses.  A recording is available to view on the USS Hub, together with a related Q&A (link behind SSO).

 
In addition, you have told us that you would appreciate relevant background information to be sent out in advance of webinars. We will ensure that we do this for all future USS events. 

with best wishes,  
Professor Anne Trefethen  
Pro-Vice-Chancellor for People and Digital 

Content are for accordion section 2. 

The USS Consultation is now live

This message is being sent to all Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) members and all staff who are eligible for the USS pension scheme 

Dear Colleagues,  

The consultation on possible improvements to contributions and benefits for the USS pension scheme opened on Monday 25 September. I am writing to let you know more about what that means and how you can respond to share your views.


A review of what has happened this year

  • It is a requirement that the USS Pension Scheme completes a valuation every three years based on a snapshot of the scheme. That snapshot was taken in March this year and gave early indications that the scheme was in a much stronger position than at the last valuation
  • The USS Trustee noted that, if the formal valuation confirmed this, it may be possible to consider a reduction in contribution rates and/or enhancement of benefits

  • The Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) asked the USS Trustee to provide an estimate of the price of pre-April 2022 benefits to allow members to consider if they would want to return to those benefits from April 2024
  • The USS Trustee consulted UUK and employers on the assumptions and Technical Provisions for the calculations leading to the formal 2023 Valuation of the scheme. This showed that benefits at the pre-April 2022 levels are affordable and with a lower overall contribution rate

  • USS has now opened this consultation with USS members and eligible staff on the benefit changes proposed by the JNC
  • You have until 24 November to consider and submit your response, either directly to USS or via the University (details below).


What do the proposed changes mean for members?

The proposals mean that the benefits you build up after 1 April 2024 may change. How they might change depends on several different things, like your salary now and in the future, when you choose to retire, and economic factors such as inflation.

Please note that all benefits you have built to date are guaranteed.


Next steps and how you can respond to the consultation

You can respond to the consultation in the following ways:  

During this time there are a number of ways for you to find out more:  

Please do get in touch through the channels above with any questions you have, and we will continue to do our best to keep you informed. 
 
With best wishes, 
Professor Anne Trefethen 
Pro-Vice-Chancellor for People and Digital


Further information

This message is being sent to all Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) members and all staff who are eligible for the USS pension scheme 

Dear Colleagues,  

USS will soon run a consultation with all members of the scheme, and all who are eligible for the scheme, on the changes proposed to future benefits based on the 2023 valuation. I am writing to you today to share this formal written notice from USS.  

When the consultation opens on 25 September I will write to you again to provide details of how you can respond to the consultation via the University, should you wish to, and further context on the consultation to support you in making your response.  

With best wishes, 
Professor Anne Trefethen 
Pro-Vice-Chancellor for People and Digital 

USS recent cyber incident: update

Dear colleagues,

I understand that many of you will be concerned about the news from USS regarding the recent cyber incident. Please find some details about this situation below, including where to find more information.

Please note that our own USS Pensions team at the University does not have any additional information about this issue. The USS website, together with any email sent directly to members froUSS recent cyber incident: updatem USS, will provide all the detail currently available. If you have any further queries or concerns not covered on www.uss.co.uk then please send a message to mydata@uss.co.uk.

What’s happened?

Hackers have targeted Capita – and USS use Capita’s technology platform (Hartlink) to support their pension administration processes.

While it has been confirmed that USS member data held on Hartlink has not been compromised, USS were informed on 11 May that regrettably details of their members, contained in files generated by Hartlink to facilitate operational processes, were held on the Capita servers accessed by the hackers.

What information has been accessed?

Unfortunately, USS now know that some, if not all, USS members’ information has been accessed. This includes titles, initials and names; dates of birth; National Insurance numbers; USS member numbers; and retirement dates.

Capita confirm that they have taken extensive steps to recover and secure the data, and they are monitoring the dark web to confirm that data compromised as a result of this incident is not circulating more widely.

What is USS doing now?

USS is proactively engaging with Capita in respect of their ongoing investigations into their cyber incident.

USS is writing to all of their members. Their message will include details about monitoring personal information for certain signs of potential identity theft. All USS members are being given free access to 12 months of monitoring services, provided by Experian – one of the UK’s leading Credit Reference agencies. 

Experian IdentityWorksSM monitors the web, social networks and public databases on your behalf 24/7, looking for your details to immediately detect theft, loss or disclosure of your vital personal and financial information. The message from USS will provide details of how to access this service and include an activation code.

Where can I find out more?

Please be assured that the University will share any updates on this matter that we are made aware of.

With best wishes

Professor Anne Trefethen 
Pro-Vice-Chancellor (People & Digital) 

Dear colleagues,  

Further to my note to you in December, I’m writing today to give you more information about the 2023 valuation of the USS scheme, and what to expect next. As previously mentioned, there are valuations of the USS scheme every three years to assess its overall financial health.

Recent joint statement from Universities UK (UUK) and University and College Union (UCU) 

I’m sharing this recent joint statement as a helpful indicator of where employers and the union hope the valuation will take us. UUK and UCU issued a joint statement after the March 2023 meeting of the Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC). It sets out their shared priorities around restoring benefits to pre-April 2022 levels, improving the approach to future valuations, and constructive conversations with the Pensions Regulator (tPR) and the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). 

As I mentioned in my December email, USS has also spoken of their hope that contribution rates can be reduced, that benefit levels can be restored, or both – subject to the valuation. 

Oxford’s perspective on changes to the scheme 

The fact the scheme has seen such a significant swing from the very large deficit of the last valuation from only a year ago (April 2022) to now a surplus shows the impact of volatility in the economy and how important an investment strategy can be. We pushed back on USS’ investment plans last year and will continue to engage and respond openly to their proposals. It became evident last year that the scheme was doing better, and we were always hopeful that the previous benefit changes and contribution rate increases could be looked at again. 

What happens next

The latest valuation will be based on a snapshot of the scheme on 31 March 2023 (but relevant developments after that date may be considered before any final decisions are made). In the next couple of months, the USS Trustee Board will propose the assumptions and Technical Provisions on which the valuation will be based. We anticipate that there will then be a consultation during the summer to allow agreement on the outcome in time to implement changes by April 2024.  

How we’ll communicate with you during the 2023 valuation 

I encourage you to attend the Open Forum on People, Pay and Conditions on 22 May. We will also host a panel webinar on USS in June, at which we will explain more about the valuation, answer your questions, and let you know how we will involve you in the scheme consultation that we anticipate USS will be running in the summer. You will be invited to the June USS webinar in due course. 

I will continue to write to you, both in these emails and through University Bulletin. 

The USS Discussion Forum has ended because it was hosted on SharePoint on-premise, which as many of you will know closed in April. We have now opened an alternative ‘Ask a Question’ feature, where you can submit questions for the USS Working Group to answer. Please do use this if you would like further information that the current FAQs page cannot help you with. 

Oxford’s USS pensions hub will continue to host updates, consultation information and more.

Please let us know how we can best communicate with you 

I want to make sure we give USS members as much of an opportunity as possible to feel informed about the USS valuation, and to understand what it means for you. 

We have prepared a short survey [this survey is now closed] and I would be so grateful if you would take two minutes to let us know what we should keep doing, stop or do differently so that this year’s valuation communications are as useful to you as possible. 

A note regarding recent allowance changes 

We recognise the recent government changes to the lifetime allowance and annual allowance may have an impact on some USS scheme members. USS recently wrote to its members, setting out the changes, and a copy of this memo is available online at Pension tax changes that might affect you (uss.co.uk) for ease of reference. If you would like to discuss what this means for you, please feel free to contact Alan Cunningham in the Pensions Office

With best wishes 

Professor Anne Trefethen 
Pro-Vice-Chancellor (People & Digital) 

Dear colleagues.

It is a while since I have written to you, as my last note in March followed the conclusion of the 2020 valuation. I’m writing today to provide an update on some recent activity on the USS scheme that you may have seen mentioned elsewhere, and to let you know what’s happening with the next scheduled valuation in March 2023. 

What the recent scheme monitoring tells us – is the scheme now in surplus? 

As you will be aware, valuations in recent years have revealed a projected deficit with the scheme, resulting either in you and the University paying increased contribution rates, or in a change to the benefit structure. 

However, as you may have heard, recent monitoring of the scheme has indicated a more positive scenario than recent valuations, indicating that the scheme may be projecting a future surplus. This is because, although there has been a significant reduction in the value of the scheme’s assets since the end of March (from £88.9bn to £72.6bn), largely driven by falling prices in bond and equity market, the rising interest rates have reduced the scheme’s liabilities at a faster rate – so that the direction of travel is positive for both the scheme's funding position and future service cost. 

While we should be mindful that the monitoring does not follow the full process that the valuation does, and so might not be entirely representative of the situation at the next valuation point, there is some room for hope here. In fact, USS has recently said: 

“If the Trustee finds, via the 2023 valuation, that the overall contribution requirement can indeed be reduced, the JNC [Joint Negotiating Committee] may be able to consider some element of change to the contributions payable by members and employers, enhancements to benefits, or a combination of the two.” 

What this would mean for you is that your monthly contributions could decrease, or the benefit structure could be improved, or both. 

What has Oxford been doing to push for improvements to the scheme? 

In February, we joined with Cambridge and Imperial to challenge USS’s debt and investment proposals in an open letter, including our concerns about Liability Driven Investing (LDI). As a couple of journalists have noted, the market turmoil of recent months has shown that our concerns were well founded; LDI has proved to be a risky approach. As it is, the USS scheme was unaffected by the recent market volatility. We will continue to challenge USS on proposals and decisions that make us concerned for the scheme, both for staff and for universities. 

Updates on ongoing work agreed as part of the 2020 valuation 

You may remember that, in addition to benefit changes, there were a few areas where it was agreed further work was needed: on flexibility for early career members of the scheme, on Conditional Indexation (an alternative scheme design) and on a governance review.  

Members of the University are engaging with the governance review and the work on Conditional Indexation. We are anticipating that there will be communications from the UUK/UCU working group on the flexibility for early career members in the New Year. 

Next steps with the 2023 valuation 

USS has told us that plans and preparations are well under way for the 2023 valuation, including for an accelerated timetable for the next valuation. The aim is for any follow-on changes to contributions and/or benefits to be decided by the JNC by 1 April 2024. For you, this means that if there are beneficial changes to contribution rates and/or benefit levels from the 2023 valuation, they will be implemented much more quickly than in previous valuations. 

We are anticipating that this accelerated timetable may result in consultations with employers that will need quick responses – as those occur and are considered by the USS Pensions Working Group we will ensure that they are shared with you either by direct email or through the USS pensions hub.   

A reminder of the ways to reach us 

I will continue to write to you whenever there are significant updates. Please continue to use the updates and resources available at Oxford’s USS pensions hub. You might find in particular that the FAQs page and glossary of terms provide helpful refreshers of key issues. If you would like to raise a question, you can do so through the discussion forum. We expect to hold a webinar or other staff event to cover USS topics next term as the valuation gets under way.  

With best wishes

Professor Anne Trefethen
Pro-Vice-Chancellor (People and Digital)

Dear colleagues,

As you may have heard directly from USS this week, the Trustee has now formally agreed to adopt the reforms to the pension scheme. I am writing to let you know a bit more about that, to recap on how we’ve engaged with and challenged the 2020 valuation over the last year, and to let you know what to expect next.

What is changing with your pension?

From 1 April the following changes will apply to your pension:

  • The salary threshold up to which guaranteed defined benefits (DB) are built up will reduce from c£60,000 per annum to £40,000 per annum. For members earning above the threshold, a contribution equal to 20% of salary will go into an individual pension pot (direct contribution).*
  • The defined benefits (DB) part of the pension will now have an accrual rate of 1/85 rather than 1/75.

Following consultation feedback from members which identified the proposed 2.5% cap on future inflationary increases as an issue of great concern, employers have agreed to pay an additional 0.2% of salary in contributions (on top of the 0.3% of salary increase which has applied from 1 October 2021) to defer the application of the cap for the next three years.

There will be no increase to your contribution rates at this time.

How has Oxford engaged with the valuation and changes?

Throughout the valuation and development of proposed changes the University has engaged with others to try to secure better changes for us all, in what has been an extremely challenging context for staff and universities. We’ve prepared a summary of the University’s decisions, responses and communications throughout the process, which I encourage you to review. I would like to thank those colleagues who have taken an active role over the last two years, in particular the members of the University USS Pensions Working Group who have continued to consider all the details and help articulate our concerns and prepare responses on our behalf to the numerous consultations that have been undertaken.

What else is Oxford doing?

We have accepted the current arrangement with the understanding it is a temporary solution. As part of our agreement to this option we also required that there is a governance review of the scheme and real consideration of other scheme structures, including conditional indexation. UUK and USS are setting up working groups and a steering group to take forward these actions and I am happy to report that we have colleagues who have volunteered to participate on those groups.

Alongside the UUK/USS activities we are working with colleagues in the sector to put together a programme of workshops/panels to take an independent view of the future of the scheme. We hope this might in due course inform the UUK/USS working groups.

Next steps

The new arrangements will come in to place on 1 April. You should see no change in your contribution levels but the University employer contribution will increase to cover the deferral of the CPI cap.
 
The discussion forum remains open for you, and there will be future communications on the progress of the working groups together with opportunities to engage in the panel discussions on the future of the scheme.

With best wishes,

Professor Anne Trefethen
Pro-Vice-Chancellor – People and Digital

*Please note that this bullet point was updated on 18 March 2022, to make the meaning clearer

Dear Colleagues,

I am aware that it is a few months since I was last in touch with you directly about USS. Since then many of you have contributed to USS’ consultation on the proposed changes to the scheme, and to our webinar for members in November. I’m writing today to let you know about some further recent activity, and what you can expect in the coming weeks. There has been a lot of activity in recent weeks; here is an update on what has happened.

Conclusion of the 2020 valuation

We heard last night that the Joint Negotiating Committee has formally decided to approve the package of reforms to the USS scheme as proposed by UUK. This includes the deferral of the CPI cap; further detail on that can be found below. Subject to the USS Trustee agreeing to adopt the reforms, the 2020 valuation will now be concluded. As part of the package, a number of work streams will soon begin, designed to strengthen the scheme for the long term, such as Conditional Indexation together with a full governance review. We will engage with USS and others to ensure these deliver the best outcomes possible for employees and employers.

USS’ consultation on how it invests your pension fund

USS have recently opened a new consultation, this time about how it proposes to invest the pension fund – such as how much risk it thinks is best to bring returns on the money. We are concerned that the proposed approach is much too cautious and will lead to poor returns for all of us. To make our views clear, we have sent an open letter jointly with Cambridge and Imperial College to USS, which you can read on our USS web pages.

UUK’s consultation on the CPI indexation cap

One element of the current proposed changes to the USS pension, based on the 2020 valuation, is that there is a cap on CPI-linked inflation increases to benefits. We were keen to see this reconsidered as it will mean that employees’ pensions can benefit better during periods of higher CPI inflation. In response to feedback from employers and members UUK put forward a proposal to introduce a transition arrangement to defer the application of the 2.5% CPI cap up to and including increases due in April 2025*. The USS Trustee confirmed the indicative pricing of the proposal is an additional 0.3% in contributions, and they have confirmed that this can be met by a temporary increase of 0.2% payable by employers for two years, and with the member share of 0.1% met by a short extension to the recovery plan, with no increase for employees.

We have responded to the UUK consultation on this proposal to confirm our support for this and on Friday we learned that UUK received majority support from employers. This means that the cap will not apply in the next three years as we complete the work for a longer-term sustainable solution.

UUK’s consultation on the UCU proposal

Earlier this month UCU put forward a proposal to the JNC to try to allow a scheme that would keep the present benefits – UCU’s proposal can be viewed in their letter to USS, and UUK’s consultation on the proposal can also be viewed online. UUK asked employers to respond to an 8-day consultation to consider whether we could support the UCU proposal. The USS Pensions Working Group met and drafted a response which Council agreed – the University did not support the proposal as it would commit the University to a schedule of future contributions that over time would go beyond affordable levels. UUK have shared the headline numbers from the consultation and 93 out of 97 employers responding to the consultation representing over 92% of the active membership of the scheme (over 98% of those responding by weighting) do not support the UCU proposal to conclude the 2020 valuation. Three employers indicated conditional support for the UCU proposal, and one employer provided support.

Next steps with the USS pension

As you may remember, the consultation with employees and employers on the proposed changes to the scheme closed on 17 January. The next steps are as follows:

  • 1 April 2022: the deadline for completion of USS’ 2020 valuation and reforms. If approved by the USS Trustee, changes come into effect in April. As there is no contribution rate change at this point, you will not see a change to your take home pay. However, the way your benefits build up will change from this point, in line with the scheme changes that are approved.
  • Over the coming months, the USS Working Group members and I will continue to do all we can to push for the best pensions for our staff and for the University: through consultations, conversations with key groups, and contributions to working groups on elements such as Conditional Indexation.

Would you like to contribute your expertise to USS discussions?

We are aware that many of you around the collegiate university have a good understanding of the issues involved and we would like to invite you to join us in our upcoming activities, focused on pushing for the best deal for Oxford staff and their USS pensions. Please get in touch if you would like to be involved.

It has been very helpful to understand your perspectives during what has been another challenging period for our pensions. Thank you for all your contributions, through our webinarsdiscussion forum or direct emails.

With best wishes,

Professor Anne Trefethen
Pro-Vice-Chancellor – People and Digital

* This means that contributions made until April 2025 would initially be subject to the same inflation proofing that has been in place until now, but from April 2025 all benefits accrued after the proposed changes come into effect would be subject to the 2.5% CPI indexation cap.

Further information:

 

USS members are invited to contribute to a new consultation on the proposed changes to the scheme’s benefits

Kirsten Gillingham, Director of Finance Operations, discusses what these changes will mean if implemented, focusing particularly on the flexible options planned for early career members.

Will the proposed changes to benefits affect those closer to retirement age and younger members differently?

Members closer to retirement age are likely to have been paying contributions into USS and accruing pension benefits for more years than younger members. This means that they will reach retirement age with a greater proportion of their pension accrued at 1/75ths than when younger members reach retirement age in the future, as this rate of accrual will reduce to 1/85ths under the proposed changes. They will also have accrued more of the defined benefit element because more of their salary will have been within the threshold before which members start paying into the defined contribution part of the pension.

Can you tell us about the proposals to offer more flexibility and lower-cost pension options for staff earlier in their career, and what this really means?

A national task and finish group is being set up to explore high-quality, lower-cost pension options. It is hoped that this can be a tripartite group including representatives from UUK (on behalf of employers), UCU (on behalf of staff) and USS. The options being explored would aim to give staff flexibility to pay in less than the current mandatory rate of 9.8% of salary and still benefit from a generous employer contribution towards their pension. Employers have asked USS to model both defined benefit options (which would offer members a set amount of pension benefits) and defined contribution options (a pension based on how much is paid in and how well investments perform). These options will be discussed and explored at the Joint Negotiating Committee, which has both UCU and employer representatives, to identify which options would best meet the needs of members who are currently choosing not to be in the scheme.

Why are these particular changes being looked at?

Around 20% of members are currently choosing not to join the scheme, and employers wanted the package of scheme changes to include urgent consideration of options to ensure that as many employees as possible can access good and affordable pension provision. We know that affordability of the scheme can be a reason for not opting in among early career staff; a flexible option would address that. Where staff opt out of USS they do not receive any employer contribution to their pension savings, and they may be making little or no alternative provision for their future pension.

Can you give me an example of what that might mean in practice for an early career scheme member at Oxford on grade 7?

We do not yet know the details of the options being developed, so we cannot give illustrative figures. We expect the options to explore levels of contribution below the current 9.8% and for which members would receive some level of defined benefits or a defined contribution pension pot. This should offer a more affordable option for staff in lower grades. As the contributions will be lower than 9.8% the future benefits will be less than those offered in the main scheme, but members would still get the benefit of contributions from the employer, which increase the value of pension savings when compared with paying into an external pension product. Some options may also lead to the pension savings being more flexible with regards to moving between schemes or between countries, but this will depend on discussions at the JNC and what options are put forward from the work of the task and finish group.

What can you tell us about the scheme that makes it attractive to remain a member – at any stage of a career?

Any pension scheme is a form of saving for your retirement, but paying into USS provides benefits that are not available through an external pension plan. The attractive aspects of USS, including under the proposals in discussion, are that:

  • the savings in the defined benefit element are increased in line with CPI (capped at 2.5%) each year, ensuring a guaranteed pension income for your future;
  • the University contributes a percentage of your salary towards your pension savings;
  • you can make additional contributions into your DC pot, giving a tax-efficient way to make savings;
  • you may have cover if you experience ill health;
  • you have Death in Service cover of three times your salary;
  • you gain a tax-free lump sum on retirement;
  • part of your pension benefits pass to your spouse/partner and your children.

What date does the consultation close?

You can respond directly and anonymously through the USS consultation website until 5pm on 17 January 2022.

Alternatively, you can share your views via the University by emailing internal.communications@admin.ox.ac.uk using the subject header ‘USS 2021’ by 5pm on 5 January 2022.

Where can I find out more?

You can watch recordings of our recent webinars discussing the 2020 valuation and potential changes to contributions and benefits. More information is available on the University’s USS Pensions hub webpages and on the USS consultation website.

Dear Colleagues,

The USS pension scheme consultation opened on Monday 1 November and I am writing to let you know more about what that means and how you can get involved.

A review of what has happened this year

  • In March, USS issued the outcome of the 2020 valuation, predicting three considerably higher contribution rates options needed in order to maintain existing benefits.
  • In response, UUK proposed a fourth option that minimises current contribution rate increases but brings in changes to future benefits.
  • In consultation with Oxford’s members we gave cautious support for the proposal, but stating clearly our reservations. In particular we supported the immediate consideration of a more sustainable solution to the ongoing deficit issues through Conditional Indexation which would mean the UUK proposal would be a short term solution.
  • The Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) of UUK and UCU representatives decided to approve this proposal and we were pleased to see that our concerns were largely addressed.
  • USS is now formally consulting with all members on UUK’s proposal. You have until 17 January to consider and submit your response.

What do the proposed changes mean for members?

  • Contribution rates will increase by 0.5% in total – this was implemented this month. For staff this means an increase from the current rate of 9.6% to 9.8%; employers see an increase from 21.1% to 21.4%.
  • Changes to future benefits: the pension accrual rate is changing from 1/75th to 1/85th. The salary threshold for Defined Benefit (DB) benefits is reducing from £59,982 to £40,000. Indexation and revaluation will now be at CPI capped at 2.5% per annum. This was discussed in further detail at our webinar on 29 September.
  • Other changes include introducing flexibility and lower cost pensions options to address the affordability issues of the scheme for staff earlier in their career; a governance review of USS; and exploration of Conditional Indexation as a new scheme design. These are proposed to be implemented as soon as possible. 

Please note that all benefits you have built to date are guaranteed.

As you will see in the consultation if this proposal does not go through we can expect to see the much higher contribution rates beginning in April 2022.

The USS consultation site provides more information about the proposals, including modelling tools to help you understand how the changes could impact you.*

Next steps and how you can respond to the consultation

Further information is provided by USS online.

You can respond to the consultation in the following ways:

During this time there are a number of ways for you to find out more:

  • We will run a webinar at the end of November or early December to give members a chance to ask questions and find out more. You will be invited directly to the webinar.
  • The discussion forum continues to provide a place for you to submit questions to the USS Working Group
  • We will continue to provide updates via emails and via our USS pensions hub.

I know that the changes throughout this year have been a source of concern to many of you. Please do get in touch through the channels above with any questions you have, and we will continue to do our best to keep you informed.

With best wishes,

Professor Anne Trefethen
Pro-Vice-Chancellor for People and Gardens, Libraries and Museums

* Please note that our understanding is that the modeller cannot take account of the CPI indexation cap post retirement, which would adversely affect your pension if CPI were to exceed 2.5% during your retirement.


Further information

USS’ formal notification the consultation, which you received by email on 21 October, can be found on our USS hub for reference.

Notice of statutory consultation 

Dear Colleagues,

USS will soon run a consultation with all members of the scheme, and all who are eligible for the scheme, on the changes proposed to future benefits. I am writing to you today to share this formal written notice from USS.

When the consultation opens on 1 November I will write to you again to provide details of how you can respond to the consultation via the University, should you wish to, and further context on the consultation to support you in making your response.

With best wishes,
Professor Anne Trefethen
Pro-Vice-Chancellor for People and Gardens, Libraries and Museums


Notice of statutory consultation by employers in relation to Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS)

This is the formal written notice of a statutory consultation in relation to USS. It contains details about proposed changes to USS, most of which would take effect from 1 April 2022, if implemented.

Please read this notice carefully, as it will affect you either as an active member of USS or as someone eligible to join USS (referred to as affected employees in this notice), and you may wish to respond to the consultation.

This consultation seeks comments from affected employees and their representatives on:
•    the Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC)’s recommended package of benefit changes and
•    the alternative contribution rates which will take effect from 1 April 2022 if the changes recommended by the JNC are not implemented before then.

You can respond to the proposals via the consultation website or via your employer. All responses received during the consultation period will be considered before any final decision is made and implemented.

The closing date for responses will be 5pm on 17 January 2022. Any responses received after that will not be considered.

PART ONE: KEY INFORMATION
Summary of the JNC’s recommended changes

•    From 1 April 2022, each year members will build up a pension in the USS Retirement Income Builder, the defined benefit section of USS, at a lower rate of 1/85 of salary compared to the current 1/75 of salary, and a separate lump sum of 3/85 rather than 3/75, up to the Salary Threshold.
•    From 1 April 2022, the Salary Threshold will reduce from £59,883.65 to £40,000.
•    From 1 April 2023, the Salary Threshold will continue to increase annually in line with official pensions, which are currently increased in line with the Consumer Prices Index (CPI), but subject to a lower maximum increase of 2.5% a year until 31 March 2025 or if earlier, the date of any change concluded by a review by the JNC of the amount of the Salary Threshold.
•    Benefits earned in the USS Retirement Income Builder from 1 April 2022 will continue to see increases applied annually before and after members retire, but subject to a lower maximum of 2.5% a year.
•    From 1 April 2022, there will be a change of benefits for those who are members of USS for a short period (more than three months but less than two years).
These proposed changes would not affect any benefits you build up before 1 April 2022. They will only affect future benefits earned from that date.

Members’ contributions will remain at their current level introduced from 1 October 2021, of 9.8% of salary. Employers’ contributions will remain at 21.4% of salary.
What happens if the JNC’s recommended changes are not implemented from 1 April 2022 (in the absence of alternative changes bringing cost savings)

The JNC has proposed changes to the scheme so that contributions won’t need to rise significantly and impact affordability for members. However, in the absence of the JNC’s (or other) proposed changes being executed by 28 February 2022, there is a proposed fall-back position, where contribution rates will increase every six months from 1 April 2022.

In the fall-back position the increase would be from the October 2021 levels of 9.8% to 18.8% of salary for members by 1 October 2025. For employers, the increase would be from 21.4% to 38.2%. See below for more details.

What to do next

1.    Read more about the proposals below and available on the consultation website www.ussconsultation2021.co.uk from w/c 25 October.
2.    Use the modelling tools on the consultation website to understand how the changes could impact you.
3.    Give your views on the proposals before 5pm on 17 January 2022 so your voice is heard. You can do this from 9am on 1 November by following the login process on the consultation website, or by giving your response to your employer. Any views you give on the website will be anonymous – your employer will not be able to identify you in your response.

PART TWO: FURTHER INFORMATION
Why the changes are being proposed

As part of the 2020 valuation, the USS Trustee determined that the cost of continuing to offer the benefits currently provided, while also repairing an estimated deficit of at least £15 billion, had increased, to require a combined contribution rate of up to 57% of salary.

Having been informed by the Trustee that costs had increased, the JNC recommended a package of changes. The contributions required for these changes were significantly reduced because of a substantial support package provided by employers (a long term commitment to the scheme and additional protection as a creditor) which greatly increased the security of the benefits already built up, in the view of the Trustee.

The JNC is a body established under the USS rules and is made up of UUK and UCU representatives as well as an independent Chair. It is responsible for deciding how to address any increase in the costs of the scheme – through changes to benefits or how the required contribution increase is shared between members and employers, or a combination of both.

The JNC’s decisions and the up-front commitment from employers to provide additional support to the scheme have allowed the Trustee to introduce a new member contribution rate from 1 October 2021 of 9.8% of salary instead of 11% (as scheduled under the 2018 valuation). However, this currently leaves a funding gap between the contributions being paid for now, and the cost of providing the current benefits. The Trustee could only accept this because the JNC agreed a fall-back position that would come into effect if the JNC’s (or other) recommendations on benefit change were not subsequently implemented. This fallback would be for contributions in the same proportions that applied under the default cost sharing rule in the scheme rules in the last valuation, based upon there being no change to current benefits. It provides the Trustee with the assurances it needs, consistent with its primary legal duty, to protect benefits that members have built up.

For more information on the valuation, go to the USS website

What USS membership currently provides

The USS Retirement Income Builder
USS members automatically join the USS Retirement Income Builder, the defined benefit section of USS. It provides members with a set level of retirement income, based on their salary up to a certain level during each year of membership of the scheme.

Currently, every year, members earn a pension which is based on 1/75 of salary, up to the Salary Threshold. The Salary Threshold is £59,883.65 for 2021/22. See below for details on how it increases each year.

Members’ benefits are calculated and ‘banked’. They are then increased, broadly in line with inflation, each subsequent year including in retirement, subject to certain caps.

When they retire, members also receive a tax-free lump sum worth three times their annual USS Retirement Income Builder pension.

The USS Investment Builder
If members earn above the Salary Threshold, have made additional contributions, or have transferred pension savings from another scheme into USS since April 2016, they will also be building up savings in the USS Investment Builder, the defined contribution section of the scheme. The amount paid into the USS Investment Builder is 8% (from the 9.8% paid) of salary above the Salary Threshold by members, and 12% (from the 21.4% paid) of salary above Salary Threshold by employers.

There are various ways in which members can use their USS Investment Builder savings, including as a tax-free lump sum or sums, investing in a drawdown product – take an income using their USS Investment Builder fund, or buying an annuity – a guaranteed income for life.

Benefits payable on death or ill health
USS members get valuable death benefits, which can include a lump sum of at least three times their salary and a pension for a spouse, civil partner, dependant or children. There are also benefits which will provide support if you become ill and have to stop working.

Details of the JNC's recommended benefit changes

The following benefit changes are proposed. They would take effect from 1 April 2022 unless stated otherwise: they would not affect any benefits you build up before 1 April 2022, they will only affect future benefits earned from that date.
• The Salary Threshold will reduce to £40,000.

Members’ benefits in the USS Retirement Income Builder will be built up based on a maximum salary of £40,000 each year – this is lower than the current figure of £59,883.65.

If you earn over £40,000 you will build up savings in the USS Investment Builder in addition to the pension and lump sum you are building up in the USS Retirement Income Builder.

This means that if, after 1 April 2022, your salary is higher than £40,000 then each year you will build up a lower USS Retirement Income Builder pension and lump sum than at present. However, contributions from you and your employer on salary over £40,000 will be used to build up your savings in the USS Investment Builder.

• The Salary Threshold will increase annually after 1 April 2022 in line with official pensions, but only up to a maximum of 2.5% in any year until 31 March 2025 or if earlier, the date of any change concluded by a review of the JNC of the amount of the Salary Threshold.

The Salary Threshold will rise in line with official pensions, but this will be subject to an annual cap of 2.5%. Currently, USS will match official pension increases up to 5%. Where the increase in official pensions exceeds 5%, one-half of the excess above 5% is also taken into account with a maximum increase of 10% in all cases.

This means that if future increases to official pensions are higher than 2.5% in any year, the Salary Threshold will only increase by 2.5%. So, for subsequent years, if you earn more than the Salary Threshold, you will then build up a lower USS Retirement Income Builder pension (but more USS Investment Builder savings) than you would if the 2.5% cap didn’t apply. The 2.5% cap will apply until 31 March 2025 or if earlier, the date of any change concluded by a review of the JNC of the amount of the Salary Threshold.

• The rate of accrual in the USS Retirement Income Builder will decrease to 1/85 from its current level of 1/75.

USS Retirement Income Builder pension will be calculated as 1/85 of salary (up to the Salary Threshold) for each year of service from 1 April 2022 onwards. This would reduce the amounts you can build up in the USS Retirement Income Builder each year.

For example, if your salary is £40,000, from 1 April 2022 you’d be building 1/85 of that salary as USS Retirement Income Builder pension which works out as £471 each year. This would then be increased annually both before and after you retire.

On the same salary, with the current 1/75 accrual rate, you’d build up a USS Retirement Income Builder pension of £533 each year which would then be increased both before and after you retire.

You will also build up a separate cash lump sum of 3/85 of your salary each year, up to the Salary Threshold. On a salary of £40,000, you’d build up £1,412 lump sum each year. On the current accrual rate of 3/75, the amount would be £1,600 each year.

• USS Retirement Income Builder benefits will be increased annually in line with official pensions but only up to a maximum of 2.5% in any year.

The future benefits that you build up in the USS Retirement Income Builder will increase every year both before and after you retire in line with official pensions but subject to a maximum increase of 2.5%. Currently, USS will match official pension increases up to 5%. Where the increase in official pensions exceeds 5%, one-half of the excess above 5% is also taken into account with a maximum increase of 10% in all cases.

So, your USS Retirement Income Builder benefits earned after 31 March 2022 will increase at a lower rate than they do now, in any year where official pensions are increased by more than 2.5%.

• From 1 April 2022, there will be a change to benefits for those who are members of USS for a short period.

Members who leave the scheme with more than three months’, but less than two years’ qualifying service, will be provided with full deferred benefits in the USS Retirement Income Builder (i.e. a pension of 1/85 of salary and a lump sum of 3/85 of salary up to the Salary Threshold for each year of active membership) rather than the current deferred benefit which is based on their contributions multiplied by an actuarial factor. On average, the change will provide a larger deferred benefit for the relevant members.
No other changes to benefits are proposed

There will be no other changes to members’ benefits. In particular:

•    The changes will not affect any benefits built up before 1 April 2022.
•    Members’ death in service benefits will continue to be calculated on the same basis as at present, providing a lump sum of at least three times salary and spouse/civil partner/dependants’ pensions.
•    Ill health retirement benefits will also continue to be calculated on the same basis as at present, which could provide a lump sum and pension where a member becomes ill and has to give up work.
•    The USS Investment Builder will continue to be available for members who make additional contributions or transfer savings into USS.
•    No changes are being made to the scheme’s normal retirement age which is currently age 66. (This is aligned to your State Pension age, so will increase in the future as the State Pension age increases).
•    Member contributions will remain at their current level of 9.8% (subject to the fall-back position set out below if the JNC’s recommended benefit changes are not introduced).

Reduced October increase

The changes proposed by the JNC above have allowed the Trustee to replace the 11% member contribution rate scheduled for 1 October 2021 with a new rate of 9.8%. The Trustee has been able to do this as the cost of the benefit structure proposed by the JNC is lower than that of the current level of benefits. But this is also based on having a fall-back position in place in case the changes don’t happen. In this event the employers’ commitments of support to the scheme fall away, and the contribution requirements reflect this, as well as the more expensive benefits.

The fall-back position if no changes are made to the scheme

In the event that no changes are made to the current structure of the scheme, then contributions would need to increase every six months from 1 April 2022 onwards to ensure the existing benefit structure is adequately funded.

This fall-back position would be the application of the required increase to contributions in the same
proportion as applied under the default cost-sharing rules used in the previous valuation. This provides the Trustee with the assurances it needs, consistent with its primary legal duty, as to the security of members’ accrued benefits.

This fall-back position would apply from 1 April 2022 if the JNC found it could not consent to an executed deed of amendment by 28 February which reflected the current JNC recommendations (or others agreed following this consultation which include contributions which support the cost of the alternative proposed benefit structure).

If the 28 February 2022 deadline is missed there would not be time to complete the necessary legal steps and implement those changes from 1 April 2022. Note, any agreed changes (including revised contribution rates) could be implemented at a later date but the time required to implement them would depend on their scale and nature.

The fall-back position would see member and employer contribution rates increase in steps every six months from 1 April 2022 until October 2025. These contribution rates will put pressure on members and employers in terms of affordability and it is for the JNC to address this should we end up in this position. The increases would be phased in over four years and this would also give the JNC the opportunity to make a decision on whether to recommend changes to benefits in future, before contributions get considerably higher.

However, in the absence of further changes to benefits and/or covenant support provided by employers and subject to the outcome of future valuations, contribution rates will increase as follows.

The fall-back position if no changes are made to the scheme
 

 

uss fall back position

 
These fall-back proposals are subject to the formal statutory consultation process implemented by this notice. This consultation will be conducted between each USS participating employer, affected employees and employee representatives.

Key dates

uss key dates

 

 

Introduction 

As many of you are aware, the USS pension scheme is currently discussing its financial position (referred to as a ‘valuation’). We know that many USS members have concerns regarding the potential impact of these discussions on their pension benefits; this article is intended to provide background and links to helpful information. 

Before we turn to factors involved in the valuation discussions, it is very important to note that any pension you have built up (‘accrued’) to date will not be affected. The current discussions relate to how future pension benefits will accrue. 

USS valuation 

The reason there has been so much publicity surrounding the USS valuation is that USS is reporting a significantly bigger deficit than previously was the case.  

This is mainly down to the way in which USS takes into account future investment returns – it is taking a more cautious view and assuming lower returns, which means the pension promises made to members become more expensive to fund. More detail can be found at our FAQs page

More expensive pension accrual requires employers and members to pay higher contributions. The rates now required are not considered by Oxford, and other employers, to be sustainable. However, the Pensions Regulator and USS believe that a cautious approach is appropriate. The additional costs that will result have led to USS and the employers discussing a number of alternative options. 

In particular, UUK has suggested changes to the scheme that lead to more affordable contribution levels, and these were adopted by the JNC on 31 August 2021. The most likely changes are that: 

  1. Future pension accrual will be at a lower rate; 
  2. The degree of inflation proofing will be lowered; and 
  3. The existing hybrid scheme will be adjusted such that more members will have a “defined contribution” element to their pension pot (where both the employer and member pay into a ‘pot’ which builds into a lump sum on retirement but there is no promise of a defined level of pension on that element of your pension).   

It is generally recognised that the proposed options are not going to provide a long-term sustainable solution for the scheme and further options under discussion for the long term are alternative scheme designs based on ‘conditional indexation’ (CI). Under CI, defined benefits already accrued will only be increased with the cost of living (‘indexation’) if the USS Trustee is satisfied that the USS scheme is in a strong enough position to support such increases. Under a CI scheme, indexation can exceed cost of living increases during periods of strong investment returns. 

The University continues, via Universities UK, to discuss options with the USS. More information about the employer relationship with USS can be found in the FAQs page.  


Summary 

We understand that members are concerned about the proposals and we hope that this page helps to explain some of the background and likely changes.   

It is important to recognise that, however disappointing the proposals may be, you will still be able to build your future pension benefits. What is different is that they will probably build at a slower rate than before. 

We have prepared a comprehensive new FAQ resource for you. Further information regarding the valuation can be found at the FAQs page

If you have a question not covered by the FAQs, please post it to our USS Discussion Forum, where a member of the USS Working Group will respond to you

Dear Colleagues, 

You may already have seen, in the press and online, that a significant decision has been made about the USS pension scheme. As you know, we had faced very concerning assessments of the scheme deficit from USS in March this year; employer and employee representatives had been meeting through the Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) with the aim of finding a solution. 

As you may recall, in responding to the consultations on the suggested solution the University support for the proposal was made with the condition that there would be a governance review initiated and that work should start immediately on consideration of sustainable solutions such as Conditional Indexation. In August we issued a joint statement to that effect with Oxford UCU, the University of Cambridge and Cambridge UCU. This set out our concerns about the longer-term sustainability of the scheme, and our hopes that a working group would be urgently appointed to explore Conditional Indexation as an alternative and beneficial approach to the scheme. 

I am glad to say that those conditions are now presented as part of the decision reached by the JNC. 

The option that has been agreed has more affordable contribution rates compared to those originally put forward by USS in March; however, they will have an impact on benefits secured. We hope that this will be limited by the fact they are not anticipated as the long-term solution.

The impact of the decision reached by the JNC

The impact on your future benefits, subject to consultation with employers and employees in the coming weeks, is as follows. Please note that all benefits you have built to date are guaranteed. 

Contribution rates will increase by 0.5% in total. For staff this means an increase from the current rate of 9.6% to 9.8%; employers will see an increase from 21.1% to 21.4%. 

Changes to future benefits: the pension accrual rate is changing from 1/75th to 1/85th. The salary threshold for Defined Benefit (DB) benefits is reducing from £59,982 to £40,000. Indexation and revaluation will now be at CPI capped at 2.5% per annum. Our USS Hub FAQ page provides further information on these elements. 

Other changes include introducing flexibility and lower cost pensions options to address the affordability issues of the scheme for staff earlier in their career; a governance review of USS; and exploration of Conditional Indexation as a new scheme design. These are proposed to be implemented as soon as possible.  

A decision is expected soon as to whether the October contribution rate increases under the previous 2018 valuation will go ahead. As soon as we know this, we will let you know. 

The University and College Union (UCU), representing employees, and Universities UK (UUK), representing employers, have issued statements about the JNC decision. The UCU statement and UUK statement can both be read online. 

Next steps

In September we expect a consultation with both employers and employees on the proposed way forward agreed by the JNC this week. When we have information on that we will be in touch again. 

To help staff in understanding the valuation and responding to the consultation, we will run a panel webinar for USS members in late September. You will receive a direct invitation to the webinar. 

The USS Working Group and I will continue to keep you updated in the following ways: 

  • Direct emails such as this 
  • Updates in University Bulletin 
  • Resources and information on the USS Pensions Hub 
  • Webinars 

We will continue to answer any questions you post in the USS Discussion Forum.  

We anticipate discussing the University response to this decision with Council at its meeting in October. 

With best wishes, 
Professor Anne Trefethen 
Pro-Vice-Chancellor for People and Gardens, Libraries and Museums 

Dear Colleagues, 

I am writing to you about the challenging situation that the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) currently faces, the potential changes under discussion, and to seek your views as part of the consultation currently under way. Whether you are a member of the scheme or have chosen to withdraw, I encourage you to respond in order to help shape the pension benefits available for current and future colleagues.


The 2020 valuation, the options and the consultation

The USS Trustees have now published their valuation report. This sets out three scenarios, showing different increases in contribution rates that would be needed to maintain the current pension benefits, depending on the covenant support measures employers feel able to support.

Every scenario presents a significant increase in costs for employees as well as for employers – with total contribution rates of 42.1%, 49.6% and 56.2% of salary – compared to the current combined contribution rate of 30.7% of salary. Even the most favourable option would be unattractive and unsustainable for all of us. In addition Universities UK (UUK) has proposed a fourth option to maintain current contribution rates but with reduced scheme benefits. UUK’s full consultation can be seen at their USS Employers site

The preliminary view of the University’s USS Working Group is that none of the four scenarios provides a sustainable solution. 

UUK is concerned about the relatively high drop-out rate of the scheme; part of the consultation is to understand the needs of colleagues who are eligible for membership and their views on potential ways forward. We would therefore like to invite you to complete a survey. The results will feed into the response and colleagues will be able to see the draft that also includes the four options put forward in the valuation report. We will share this on Oxford’s USS web pages and via direct email. 

To inform our response to UUK, we would like to hear from Oxford staff who are eligible to join USS – whether you are currently a member or have decided to withdraw from the scheme. The information you provide in this survey will be confidential but, by increasing our understanding of what you need from your pension, will help the Oxford USS Working Group to formulate its response to this consultation.  


Next Steps

There will be a webinar at 3.30-4.45pm on Thursday 6 May, at which members of the University’s USS Working Group will be able to provide an overview of the consultation, answer questions and listen to your feedback.  

The survey will close at midday on Friday 14 May. 

You will also have an opportunity to feedback on the University’s draft response in advance of the USS Working Group sending the final response on 24 May. 

The University’s USS Working Group will continue to answer any questions posted to the pensions discussion forum

Once the University’s response has been submitted to UUK it will be shared with staff on Oxford’s USS web pages


I know that this continues to be a very uncertain and difficult situation. It is important to note that any benefits you have accrued in the scheme to date are safe and secure. Thank you for your patience and participation in the survey. 

With best wishes, 

Professor Anne Trefethen 
Pro-Vice-Chancellor for People and Gardens, Libraries and Museums 


Further information
Recordings of the recent ‘back to basics’ webinars on USS are available online. 

UUK has provided the following:

Dear colleagues,

As you may have seen, we have now heard from USS about the outcome of the 2020 valuation. We have been surprised and disappointed that the USS report is even more challenging than we had expected.


Headlines

  • The USS Trustee has proposed three illustrative scenarios for the outcome of the 2020 valuation, two of which will require higher levels of covenant support from employers, such as pledging assets and/or contingent contributions. These scenarios will now be discussed by the Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC).
  • In all three scenarios benefits would remain the same but there would be significant increases to the current total contribution rate of 30.7% of salary (21.1% paid by the employer and 9.6% paid by the member). The three illustrative scenarios are as follows:
    1. one in which, based on the current employer covenant support commitments, the total contribution rates increase to 56.2% of salary;
    2. another which is based on an illustrative package of covenant support commitments suggested by Universities UK (UUK), who represent employers, in which contribution rates increase to 49.6% of salary;
    3. the most favourable scenario presented, which would require further financial commitments from employers to strengthen the scheme’s covenant, and has an increase in the overall contribution rate to 42.1% of payroll.
  • A number of elements from this valuation have been particularly challenging, and we have spoken out about these, most notably through a letter to USS.
  • In terms of next steps, there will be a consultation organised by Universities UK (UUK) starting later this month which will provide all USS employers with the opportunity to comment on ways to address the scheme’s high opt-out rate and the sizeable deficit, including covenant support measures, affordable benefit structures and changing contribution levels.
  • We hope that all USS eligible staff will engage with the consultation.
  • We will keep you informed in coming months through the channels you have previously told us are most helpful to you: webinars, emails and updates both to our web pages and in the University Bulletin.

The Long Read

The USS Trustee undertakes valuations of the scheme every three years, and today USS announced the outcome of the valuation undertaken on 30 March 2020. The future scheme deficit as assessed by the valuation is over £14bn.

As you know, currently members of the scheme contribute 9.6% of their salary, and employers 21.1% of salary. For current benefits to be preserved, the USS Trustee has concluded that members and employers would need to make significant increases in their contributions; they have set out three illustrative scenarios showing how this may be done.

The central case (Scenario 2) is based on an illustrative package of covenant support measures developed by UUK after consultation with employers. This achieves an overall contribution rate of 49.6%. USS have also put forward their view that without any further package of support measures, the required rate would be 56.2% (Scenario 1); a further illustration (Scenario 3) shows that with stronger covenant support measures from employers a rate of 42.1% can be achieved. The assumptions used by the USS Trustee seem to seriously undervalue the collective and enduring financial strength of the university sector. To date the USS Trustee has not provided a clear and reasoned justification either for its rejection of UUK’s suggested covenant measures, or for its position that much higher levels of covenant support are needed. However in a letter to USS, the Pensions Regulator (TPR) has made its position clear that the latter two scenarios are at the limit of compliance with UK pensions legislation.

Under the terms of the 2018 valuation, the total contribution from employers and active members of the scheme is set to rise to 34.7% from this October – split 23.7% and 11% respectively. We had hoped that this would not occur and that we would be able to complete the valuation on time; however, USS has informed the TPR that it will not be possible to complete the valuation by the statutory deadline of 30 June 2021. We should therefore be prepared for the October rise.

The high dropout rate of the pension scheme – approximately 20% of new starters choose not to be part of it – suggests that staff feel that the USS scheme is not affordable or suitable for them. The prices that the USS Trustee has set in these scenarios for maintaining current levels of pension benefits are well above the levels of affordability both for employers and for scheme members, who are at risk of being priced out of the scheme.

Oxford’s USS Working Group has had many discussions about the way in which the deficit is calculated, as well as the additional measures required to demonstrate the collective financial strength of USS scheme employers (‘covenant support measures’).

We have publicly highlighted a number of these issues, most recently in a letter jointly with the colleges and UCU to USS Chief Executive Bill Galvin.

In terms of next steps, over the next few days, UUK (representing employers) will be holding discussions with USS and The Pensions Regulator, asking USS to give clear reasoning for the much higher level of contributions proposed.

Later this month there will be a consultation organised by UUK with employers and their staff on ways to address the scheme’s high opt-out rate and the sizeable deficit, including covenant support measures, affordable benefit structures and changing contribution levels.

We are providing a number of communications and events to give you further information:

  • ‘Back to basics’ webinars about USS with pensions officer Alan Cunningham on 25 March and 20 April (you will receive direct invitations to these)
  • A further panel webinar in April/May
  • Regular direct emails to members such as this one
  • Continued updates to the USS webpages
  • Online discussion forum.

I know that this is difficult news. My colleagues and I remain committed to doing all we can to support you in understanding and navigating the developments with the USS scheme this year. Please take part in our consultation later this month through the webinars and online discussion forum, as we want to ensure all of our voices are heard.

With best wishes,
Professor Anne Trefethen
Pro-Vice-Chancellor for People and Gardens, Libraries and Museums


Useful Resources

Professor Anne Trefethen provides an update for staff on the delay of the next stage of the 2020 valuation, and outlines what staff can expect in the months ahead as work continues to find a way forward. Read the blog

Further to our email of 2 October, the draft response to the USS Technical Consultation can now be found in the 'Oxford University Updates' section of the University's USS Pension homepage. The response was prepared by the USS Working Group and has been discussed by Council.  

Any comments received by 24 October will be considered and the final version will then be approved by Council and submitted on 30 October.  Please send comments to alan.cunningham@admin.ox.ac.uk with the email subject line 'CONSULTATION'.

With many thanks,

Anne Trefethen (Pro-Vice-Chancellor of People and Gardens, Libraries and Museums) 

Fabian Essler (Chair of the USS Working Group) 

In the update on 9 September, we noted that the USS consultation document reflects an unusual level of uncertainty and the consultation is even more complex than we had anticipated. We have now received further information from UUK and their actuarial advisors Aon and initial discussions have been held both within the USS Working Group and at Council. 

There is no question that the consultation is concerning and the USS illustrative figures indicate alarming potential future contribution rates. We are disappointed that USS has taken a piecemeal approach to the valuation consultation making it difficult for employers to respond in a meaningful way.  

There is an option simply not to engage with the consultation, but Council agreed that we should engage with it and that our response should speak to our broader concerns as well as the specific questions posed. Council also agreed that in parallel with our consultation response to UUK, we should engage directly with USS and The Pensions Regulator. We will be meeting with the chief executive of USS next week and will write with our concerns to The Pensions Regulator. In our response to the consultation and in our discussions with USS we will be raising questions about their approach, the proposed risk management framework, the discount rates used and the length of recovery plan. 

The USS Working Group continues to develop our response in full and as usual this will be made available for comment before submission. We will provide a summary of key aspects of the consultation during a webinar at 2.30pm on 5 October. Register to join the webinar and to submit a question. Please note that registration closes at 10am on 5 October. 

With many thanks,

Anne Trefethen (Pro-Vice-Chancellor of People and Gardens, Libraries and Museums) 

Fabian Essler (Chair of the USS Working Group) 

 

As you may have seen in the press or on social media USS have now published their consultation on the next stage of the pension valuation. This consultation is focused on the methodology and assumptions for the Scheme’s Technical Provisions, which is the estimate of the liabilities of the scheme. The USS Trustee’s have provided a range of illustrative and alarming outcomes under a wide set of assumptions. These assumptions will play an important role in determining the outcome of the valuation, including the cost of new benefits that are being built up in the scheme.

There are several factors that could impact the Technical Provisions significantly that are yet to be agreed and further consultations still to be had on other elements of the valuation, which will then be followed by negotiations on contribution rates.

This means that the Scheme’s Technical Provisions consultation document reflects an unusual level of uncertainty within it, and while it does reflect important changes to the scheme in line with some of the JEP recommendations, the range of the consultation is even broader and more complex than we had anticipated.

We will need to wait for further technical information before we can properly engage with the consultation. We believe that UUK and their actuarial advisors AON will provide that to us shortly. Once we have received this additional information, the USS Pensions Working Group will consider the University’s response.

We will keep you informed and a webinar will be held on 5 October. If you wish to read the consultation document it can be viewed on the USS website.  

Meanwhile we will continue to work with our colleagues across the sector to maintain the USS pension scheme as an attractive and sustainable scheme.

With many thanks,

Anne Trefethen (Pro-Vice-Chancellor of People and Gardens, Libraries and Museums) 

 

 

Dear colleagues,

I am writing to keep you updated during a time of much change and debate regarding the USS pension scheme. When I wrote on 27 August we were expecting a formal consultation on Option 3 of the potential options going forward: you can now find the University response to that consultation here. The University’s response expresses the view that the third of the three options proposed was the “least worst option.” It provides time for the continuing independent review work of the Joint Expert Panel (JEP) and importantly does not result in the higher contributions that were planned – nor is there any impact on benefits.

In August Option 3 was agreed by the Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) and last Thursday the USS Trustees met and agreed to it.

It is not supported by the University and College Union (UCU) and as members of UCU will be aware there is a ballot on industrial action open from 9 September to 30 October on both pensions and pay. You can find UCU’s position here; Universities UK (UUK), which represents the 341 employers in the negotiations, has published its views here

As ever this is a difficult issue and we are working hard to resolve it. A great deal has been achieved over the last two months and I’m grateful to colleagues who have worked through the summer to respond to the consultations and for their contributions to what are often very technical and complex issues. That hard work will need to continue as we aim to support the work of JEP, and work with partners in UUK and with employees, to take forward discussions on the USS scheme before the next valuation in 2020.

The agreement of Option 3 means that from 1 October your pension contributions will increase to 9.6%, while for the University, contributions will increase to 21.1%. Some of you may find that a number of factors are affecting your payslips in September and October, with the national pay award for non-clinical staff in September pay and the annual increment for many of our staff implemented in October.

I will write again when there is more news. For now, I encourage you to sign up to the webinar on Tuesday 24 September, at which we will discuss the current situation and answer as many of your questions as we can. Please submit questions in advance if you would like – even if we can’t answer your question in the webinar, we will ensure we post responses on our discussion page.

With best wishes,

Professor Anne Trefethen

Pro-Vice-Chancellor for People and Gardens, Libraries and Museums

 

As many of you will be aware USS have been preparing for a 2020 valuation as part of the agreed way forward. The planned date for the snapshot of data for the valuation was always 31st March 2020.

Although we are experiencing extremely unusual times, the USS Trustees made the decision to proceed with the 2020 valuation as planned. A delay may have triggered increased contributions; which would have been detrimental to staff and the University in the short term.

In recognition of the uncertainty of the current conditions, and the challenges currently faced by all parties, the USS will take into account the market recovery of the next 15 months for this valuation.

The University’s USS Review Working Group continues to work alongside UUK to do all we can to reach a positive outcome for staff and the University. Updates relating to the valuation will be shared with members as they become available.

Dear colleagues,

If you have received this and you are not an active member of USS, an employee eligible to join USS nor a recognised employee representative, please ignore this notice. If you are unsure whether you are eligible to join USS, please email Alan.Cunningham@admin.ox.ac.uk.

This email is formal notice of a statutory consultation in relation to the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS). It contains the following:

  • Details about a proposed change to USS
  • The background to this proposed change
  • Key dates for the consultation
  • How you can respond to the consultation
  • Information about accessibility and different formats
  • Frequently asked questions

The proposed change

From 1 April 2020, that the salary threshold, currently £58,589.70, will increase each year in line with Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation (subject to a cap, which means the maximum increase in any year will be 10%*) until 31 March 2025 or if earlier, until it is reviewed by the Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC).

This means that, subject to consultation, the salary threshold will continue to increase in the same way it has since the USS Investment Builder was introduced in 2016. Otherwise, it would no longer rise annually from 31 March 2020:

  • It will rise in line with CPI inflation every 1 April until 31 March 2025.
  • The rise will be capped at a maximum of 10%* each year.
  • The JNC can review the salary threshold at any time before 31 March 2025, with a view to changing this arrangement.
  • In the absence of any changes to the USS rules by 1 April 2025, the revaluation of the salary threshold would cease at that point.
  • Any subsequent changes to the salary threshold, either as a result of a JNC review or from 31 March 2025, will be subject to consultation with USS members, eligible employees and their representatives.

* The ‘cap’ operates so that the rate of increase in official pensions will be applied in full, so long as it is up to 5% a year. If such increase in official pensions is more than 5% in a year, the increase to the salary threshold would also include one half of that year’s increase above 5%, up to an overall maximum of 10%.

Background

  • In 2016, the USS Retirement Income Builder and the USS Investment Builder were introduced, following a decision by the JNC:
    • The USS Retirement Income Builder is the Defined Benefit part of the scheme, where all members paying contributions build up benefits based on their salary up to the salary threshold.
    • The USS Investment Builder is the Defined Contribution part of the scheme. Members earning above the salary threshold also build savings here.
    • The salary threshold was set at £55,000.
  • Under the USS rules, the salary threshold increased each 1 April in line with CPI inflation (subject to a cap, as detailed above), until 31 March 2020 or if earlier, until the conclusion of a review by the JNC:
    • The JNC is part of the USS governance structure. It is made up of equal numbers of members from the University and College Union and Universities UK (representing USS members and employers respectively) and an independent chair.
    • The JNC has reviewed the salary threshold and recommended to the trustee that it continues to increase in line with CPI inflation (subject to a cap, as detailed above) until 31 March 2025 or if earlier, until it concludes another review.
    • The JNC’s proposal, subject to consultation, will prevent the salary threshold from remaining static at the current level of £58,589.70 from 1 April 2020.
  • As this proposal, subject to the outcome of a consultation, would result in a listed change to USS, USS employers are required by law to consult with those affected and their representatives. This includes:
    • active members of USS – all members making contributions to USS;
    • employees eligible to join USS;
    • recognised representatives of USS members and employees eligible to join USS.

Key dates

  • The consultation will run from Friday 24 January 2020 for 60 days, until 5pm on Monday 23 March 2020.
  • All responses must be received by 5pm on Monday 23 March 2020.

How you can respond to the consultation

You can respond to this consultation by:

  • emailing EmployerConsultation@uss.co.uk;
  • sending your response directly to the pensions contact at your workplace;
  • giving a verbal response to the pensions contact at your workplace; or
  • sending your response to your recognised trade union representative.

Please note: Your response to the consultation can be anonymous and does not have to include your name or USS member number, but it must include the name of the institution at which you are employed. If you work for more than one USS eligible employer, please make a note of each institution.

Accessibility and different formats

Please let your employer know if you would like a hard copy of this notice. The content of this email will be available in Welsh, braille and large print format on request. To request a format that meets your needs, please email EmployerConsultation@uss.co.uk with details of your request.

Please note: The statutory consultation will begin on Friday 24 January 2020 and not from the time you receive this information in a different format.

Frequently asked questions

 

  1. Will I be affected?

All active members of USS who earn above the current salary threshold, or who may in future earn above the relevant salary threshold,  may be affected, as implementing the proposal would increase over the period the maximum salary on which these members can build up benefits in the USS Retirement Income Builder and affect the level of contributions they save in the USS Investment Builder.

If you are a retired member or are no longer paying contributions to USS, your pension benefits would not be affected, unless you have taken flexible retirement and are still contributing to the scheme or you are working in a role which means you are eligible to re-join USS.

 

  1. What exactly am I being consulted on?

You are being consulted on the proposal that the salary threshold continues to rise in line with CPI inflation (subject to a cap as detailed above), as per the current arrangement, from 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2025 or if earlier, until the conclusion of a review by the JNC. If the proposed change is not introduced by 1 April 2020, the salary threshold will cease to be revalued and will remain at the current amount of £58,589.70 from 1 April 2020.

Your response will be read and considered by the trustee (Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited).

 

  1. When does the consultation start and end?

The consultation will start on Friday 24 January 2020 and close 60 days later, on Monday 23 March 2020 (responses must be received by 5:00pm).

 

  1. Will this affect any pension benefits I have already built up?

No. All USS Retirement Income Builder benefits you have already built up are protected by law.

 

  1. Why does there have to be a consultation?

Under pensions law, certain changes to occupational pension schemes are defined as ‘listed changes’. Before a ‘listed change’ can be made, the law requires employers to undertake a consultation with affected employees (active scheme members and those eligible to join the scheme) and their representatives. The JNC’s proposal would require a listed change to be made to the USS rules, so the law says that employers must consult with USS members, employees eligible to join USS and recognised employee representatives. Only after the consultation is complete can the USS rules be amended to incorporate a listed change.


More information

If you have any questions or would like more information about this consultation, please get in touch with the pensions contact at your workplace.
 

Yours sincerely,

Professor Anne Trefethen

Pro-Vice-Chancellor for People and Gardens, Libraries and Museums

Dear colleagues,

I am writing to let you know the outcome of last week’s employer and union Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) meetings regarding USS pensions. The meeting was set to review proposals from both Universities UK (UUK), representing employers, and UCU, representing employees.

The JNC has adopted ‘Option 3’ of the options presented by the USS. The University had responded to the last consultation to indicate we felt this would be the least worst of the options as it provides time for the continuing independent review work of the Joint Expert Panel (JEP) and does not result in the higher contributions that were planned.

UUK will now run a consultation with employers regarding the adoption of Option 3, with a deadline of 9 September. UCU has confirmed that it will conduct a ballot on industrial action regarding this outcome, which will run from 9 September to 30 October. We encourage staff to use the links on our pensions web pages to both UCU’s and UUK’s perspectives on our collective efforts to resolve the USS valuation issues.

If the UUK consultation results in support for Option 3, the employee contributions will increase from 8.8% to 9.6% and the employer contributions from 19.5 to 21.1% from 1 October. This would be lower than previously anticipated and there would not be any further increase next April.

To help you work out what this means specifically for you, please use this contributions calculator to see the impact on your salary. At Oxford we pay pension contributions before tax which means your taxable pay is reduced. The calculator provided by USS expresses the impact of contributions on your gross pay; the impact on your net pay will be less. For basic rate tax payers the estimated contribution rate from 1 October will therefore be 7.8% of net pay (as against 9.6% of gross pay).

Looking forward, this rate will be in place until the next valuation, which will be finalised in October 2021.

The University will continue to give full support to the work of the JEP, which will be of critical importance in finding a sustainable way forward beyond the current valuation period.

We know from survey responses, questions submitted to our forum and conversations with staff that you would value further clarity about the situation. We are therefore providing additional information for you regarding pensions. Here are the resources and events that may help you:

  • ‘Any questions’: a webinar to be held at 12pm on 24 September. This will cover the latest updates and will also provide time for any questions you may have about the pensions developments to date. You can also submit questions in advance by emailing internal.communications@admin.ox.ac.uk for our panel to cover at the session.
  • A new introductory Q&A document which colleagues have drafted in order to provide a succinct summary of the situation and its impact.

Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns through our staff pensions forum. I will be in touch again when there is more news and I am very grateful for your patience during this challenging time.

With best wishes

Professor Anne Trefethen

Pro-Vice-Chancellor for People and Gardens, Libraries and Museums

Dear Colleagues,

I wrote to you earlier  to say we were hoping the current valuation of the USS pension scheme might be resolved in July. Unfortunately it now seems likely that we will not get a decision until 20 August.

We are now expecting two different proposals to be put forward at the employer and union Joint Negotiating Committee on 20 August. Universities UK, representing employers, will be tabling Option 3 proposed by the USS trustees. This would mean staff contributions to the scheme rising from 8.8% of salary to 9.6% in October, while employer contributions rise from 19.5% to 21.1%. The second proposal, from the University and College Union, is that employees pay no further contributions over 8% and employers meet the cost of all further contribution increases. This would mean if the overall contribution rate of Option 3 were agreed employers paying 22.7% from this October, an additional £7m that would need to be found from existing budgets.

Time is getting tight on this valuation. If the two sides cannot agree by 1 September, we expect that the set of previously-agreed higher contributions will apply from October. Contributions for staff and employers will be 10.4% and 22.5% respectively with a further round of increases next April. Please refer to the attached document for a table of the proposed increases.

The University’s own preference remains the proposals put forward last September by the Joint Expert Panel (JEP) set up by UUK and the UCU. We regard Option 3 as the “least worst” of the options subsequently put forward by USS, while being close to the JEP proposed contribution levels it also allows for the phase two of work of JEP to be completed.

I am sorry not to have more definite news at this stage. We very much hope that an agreement can be reached in August, avoiding the sharper rises in contributions that we all currently face in October. We will of course keep you updated on all these developments and continue to provide as much information as we can through the staff pensions webpages.

We know from previous feedback that it can be hard to keep track of the many different terms and acronyms in the pensions world. Our pensions website now has a summary of the different stakeholders involved, along with a glossary of terms which you may find useful for these updates.

Please also get in touch via the online staff pensions forum if you have questions.

With best wishes

Professor Anne Trefethen

Pro-Vice-Chancellor for People and Gardens, Libraries and Museums

As we enter the summer months I thought it might be useful to update everyone on where things stand with the dispute over USS pensions. Colleagues within the University and across the country are working assiduously in an effort to arrive at a solution that provides the best possible affordable pension for all USS members. 

Nationally, the Joint Expert Panel has been convened and the remit has been agreed. Reports of the meeting are available on both the UUK and UCU websites. The panel will continue to meet throughout the summer with a plan to produce a report in September. Any agreement the panel reaches will help the Joint Negotiating Committee devise a proposal on which there would be a national consultation. 

Meanwhile, the pension trustees have indicated their intention of preparing for the implementation of rule 76.4 which would raise pension contributions from the current 26% to 37% in the absence of an agreement. 

Within the University we have a number of initiatives underway to ensure broad consultation on the issues and open discussion of any trade-offs that may need to be made. Our USS Review Working Group will be meeting during the summer to explore creative ways we might be able to arrive at a pension scheme that maximizes benefits while proving affordable for the University as a whole. A list of the members of our USS Review Working Group is available here

We will also hold open fora on Pensions to provide information and facilitate discussion of the issues. The first of these will be held on 12 June at 10:30am in the Saïd Business School. I hope as many of you as possible will attend. Please feel free to submit questions in advance to internal.communications@admin.ox.ac.uk or bring your questions to the meeting. Please register to attend this event here. 

In addition to creating a new online forum, a new pensions site has been developed within the Staff Gateway to try to make comprehensive information about pensions more accessible. There are also links on this page to other sites, such as the USS, UCU and UUK to make it easier for you to stay abreast of developments over the coming months. 

I hope that the wounds caused by this dispute are starting to heal and that we can work together in order to be in a better position to respond to the results of the national negotiations in the autumn. I believe that active engagement and open communication are critical and hope that everyone interested will engage with the opportunities outlined above.

You will by now have received the welcome news that the members of the University and College Union have voted in favour of the most recent ACAS facilitated proposal, namely the creation of a Joint Expert Panel to agree key principles to underpin the future joint approach to the valuation of the USS fund.  In so doing, they have given the UCU leadership a mandate to suspend industrial action with immediate effect.

This is very welcome news to our whole community, but especially to our students, who can return for Trinity term confident that their studies will not be disrupted in this critical exam period. The suspension of industrial action also gives us an opportunity to come together as a community to address what remains a really difficult challenge.

The first step in this process will take place on 24 April when Congregation will convene to discuss the pensions issue.  Any and all views will be welcome, as will creative ideas on how we might realize the commitment Council has made to seek pension provision for USS members employed by the University that is of the same standard as currently available. The details of the meeting will be in Thursday’s (19 April) Gazette. If you are a member of Congregation and would like to speak, please let the Secretariat know in advance by emailing congregation.meeting@admin.ox.ac.uk.

A number of practical questions about the composition and remit of the Joint Expert Panel remain to be agreed between UUK and UCU before the terms of reference and timescales can be published. Given the statutory responsibilities of the USS Trustee and the Pensions Regulator their support for the process must also be secured. I very much hope that in reviewing the assumptions in the current valuation, this panel will increase the transparency of the process and build confidence in the result.

We will continue to provide regular updates on local and national developments.

You will by now have received the welcome news that the members of the University and College Union have voted in favour of the most recent ACAS facilitated proposal, namely the creation of a Joint Expert Panel to agree key principles to underpin the future joint approach to the valuation of the USS fund.  In so doing, they have given the UCU leadership a mandate to suspend industrial action with immediate effect.

This is very welcome news to our whole community, but especially to our students, who can return for Trinity term confident that their studies will not be disrupted in this critical exam period. The suspension of industrial action also gives us an opportunity to come together as a community to address what remains a really difficult challenge.

The first step in this process will take place on 24 April when Congregation will convene to discuss the pensions issue.  Any and all views will be welcome, as will creative ideas on how we might realize the commitment Council has made to seek pension provision for USS members employed by the University that is of the same standard as currently available. The details of the meeting will be in Thursday’s (19 April) Gazette. If you are a member of Congregation and would like to speak, please let the Secretariat know in advance by emailing congregation.meeting@admin.ox.ac.uk.

A number of practical questions about the composition and remit of the Joint Expert Panel remain to be agreed between UUK and UCU before the terms of reference and timescales can be published. Given the statutory responsibilities of the USS Trustee and the Pensions Regulator their support for the process must also be secured. I very much hope that in reviewing the assumptions in the current valuation, this panel will increase the transparency of the process and build confidence in the result.

We will continue to provide regular updates on local and national developments.

The special meeting of Council which was convened to review its position on the UUK survey of USS pension risks ended earlier this afternoon. Council has decided, in light of the meeting of Congregation yesterday, to reverse its previous response. In answer to UUK’s question “Does your institution support the level of risk being proposed by the USS trustee for this valuation?” Council’s position is now: “My institution accepts the level of risk being proposed by the Trustee”, and so its previous rejection of the level of risk proposed is changed to acceptance. This will be communicated to UUK later today. Council also withdrew its Notice Of Opposition to Resolution 5, the motion which was due to be debated at Congregation yesterday.

Council recognises that this issue should have been handled better. It has listened to and understood concerns across the University about the financial impact on staff who are members of the USS pension scheme, and it will continue to argue in favour of the best possible, sustainable pensions for all its staff. When Council meets again on Monday it will have a much fuller discussion about pensions, including ways in which it can ensure that it remains closely in touch with opinion across the collegiate University.

Dear USS member

USS is the pension scheme for staff in academic and academic related roles (Grade 6 and above).

As you will be aware there are significant changes to the USS pension scheme under discussion in the national-level USS Joint Negotiating Committee. Formal negotiations between employer and member representatives will continue during December 2017.

Any agreed changes to member benefits or contributions will require full consultation with scheme members and other affected employees in spring 2018. As you may also be aware the University and College Union (UCU) is currently balloting members on industrial action at Oxford and around fifty other research-intensive universities including Cambridge, Manchester and Imperial College London. The ballot – which opened on November 29 and closes on January 19 – has been called in response to these proposed changes to USS pensions.

This could result in industrial action from February 2018. Measures could include refusal to cover or reschedule classes, or to provide cover for sick colleagues – but the exact nature of possible action has not been confirmed. The USS trustees have a legal obligation to review the pension scheme’s financial position. USS advisers estimate that the scheme has a deficit of c.£7.5 billion and that the cost of funding current benefits has risen by at least 11%.

To ensure its sustainability, employers propose that future benefits would be delivered by modifying the salary threshold so that pension saving would build up in the USS Investment Builder, the defined contribution section, with no further buildup of defined benefit pension. This proposal would tackle the current financial deficit and rising future costs, while ensuring USS continues to offer attractive pensions benefits to members.

Employers – including Oxford – have committed to maintaining their total employer contribution to USS at 18%, allocated towards ongoing buildup of new benefits, deficit recovery contributions, life assurance benefits and expenses. Any changes implemented to the USS benefit structure would only apply to the build-up of future benefits. Accrued pensions – built-up prior to any changes – are protected under law. Oxford’s own USS Review Working Group has considered this matter carefully, taking specialist advice from independent actuaries. The University has responded to two consultations on the issue, with responses submitted to Universities UK in March and September this year.

Details can be found at www.ox.ac.uk/Oxford&USS. The pages also provide answers to a range of questions, with links to relevant documents. UCU members can also access information from their union at https://www.ucu.org.uk/.  The University will keep you informed and will also update you and all other employees on the outcome of the UCU ballot in due course. Our dedicated webpages will then provide updates on key developments.

Yours sincerely
Julian Duxfield
Director of Human Resources

SECTION TWO: Updates and notices

Updates from organisations involved with the USS scheme.

A letter from UUK Head of Pensions, Sharon Moore was sent to Vice-Chancellors, Principals and Chief Executives to share news of an additional, short consultation by USS on the proposed lower rates of contributions for members and employers.

The lower rates – 6.1% for members (currently 9.8%) and 14.5% for employers (currently 21.6%) – are planned from 1 January 2024 as part of the overall accelerated timeline for the 2023 valuation. The University welcomes the implementation of reduced contributions for its USS members as early as possible and supports this proposal.

Key messaging

  • The USS Trustee, which is legally responsible for the scheme, has said that the improved financial position since the last valuation has been caused by the rapid and substantial rise in interest rates and, to a lesser extent, by the changes necessary at the 2020 valuation which included extra (covenant) support measures from employers.
  •  Earlier this year, Universities UK, representing 330 USS employers, and the University and College Union (UCU), representing scheme members, jointly agreed to lower contributions for members and to improve future benefits to their pre-April 2022 levels, where such changes can be made sustainably. In a ballot, union members overwhelmingly voted to endorse this agreement. We believe that this new relationship of collaboration and partnership can reset pensions negotiations in the future.
  • The USS Trustee believes the cost of returning future benefits to the pre-April 2022 level requires a total contribution from employers and scheme members of 20.6% of salary, which is significantly lower than the current level of 31.4%. 
  • If implemented, this would mean that a scheme member earning £50,000 will be paying much less for their pension - £1,750 a year, or £145 a month, less as their pension contributions drop from 9.6% to 6.1% of salary until at least the next valuation in three years’ time. The priority for employers is to move to this new contribution rate as soon as possible so that staff benefit in full through their take-home pay. 
  • In recognition of the changes in benefits between the last and current valuation and the improved funding position of the scheme, the union and employers have agreed to provide an increase of £215 to the pension pot of eligible USS members paying into the scheme since April 2022. Such an augmentation payment is unprecedented in pension schemes and employers are pleased to support it.  For most members, this payment, when combined with the benefits built up in the scheme over the last two years, is worth more than they would have built up in Defined Benefits over the course of the last two years if no changes had been made to the scheme at the last valuation. This is certainly the case for members with salaries up to £40,000.
  • Employers are also committed to continuing to work in partnership with the union to investigate low-cost options, exploring the feasibility of alternative scheme structures such as Conditional Indexation, and on USS governance reform. These measures could provide long-term stability and increase confidence in the scheme as part of the package of measures agreed with UCU.

Full letter

Dear Colleagues,

A joint statement on UUK and UCU collaboration towards scheme stability, USS benefit improvements and reduced contribution rates

Following extensive negotiations between the two Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) teams, UUK has agreed a joint statement with UCU on an outline agreement to finalise the USS 2023 valuation.

This latest statement builds on the interim statement in February and the joint updates in March and May, following employer support for a prompt conclusion to the valuation and an agreement for a Defined Benefit pension augmentation proposal - subject to appropriate consultation processes by both UCU and UUK.

The joint statement is set out below, and has been published on the USS Employers and the UCU websites:

A Joint Statement on UUK and UCU collaboration towards scheme stability, USS benefit improvements and reduced contribution rates

This statement is agreed by both UCU and UUK subject to completion of their own consultation processes.

UCU and UUK have been building on the work set out in the joint statements issued on 17 February, 15 March and 25 May 2023 to jointly prioritise the improvement of benefits to pre-April 2022 levels, where this can be done in a demonstrably sustainable manner. We want to provide an update on this work.

Demonstrably sustainable

UCU and UUK have been working with the USS Trustee to consider sustainability through a joint Stability Working Group. The contributions threshold modelling produced by the USS Trustee, which has been published in the Trustee’s Technical Provisions consultation documents, provides evidence that improving benefits to pre-April 2022 levels is demonstrably sustainable for at least the next two valuation cycles when the bulk of the surplus, as at March 2023, is retained for this valuation.

Benefit Improvement

Subject to the outcome of the 2023 valuation process and consultations, we agree to recommend that member benefits return to pre-April 2022 levels, for service from 01 April 2024. In summary:

  • A higher accrual rate for Defined Benefit (DB) pension of 1/75 of salary and 3/75 of salary for the retirement lump sum.
  • An increase in the DB Salary Threshold from £41,004 to within a range of £66,400 to £73,040 (depending on the September 2023 CPI rate); and
  • Removal of the 2.5% pa cap on pension increases, both before and after retirement, and replacement with the USS standard pension increase (soft-cap) that was in place before April 2022.

A consultation of affected employees and their representatives on the proposed benefit changes was launched on 25 September 2023 and is due to end on 24 November 2023 (www.ussconsultation2023.co.uk).

Contribution Rates

For this valuation, UCU and UUK agree to apply the ‘cost-share’ rule for the reduction in the contribution rate confirmed by the Trustee for pre-April 2022 benefits. The expected required contribution rate is 20.6%. The split in reduction between employers and members, in accordance with the ratio 65:35 stated in the scheme rules, is expected to result in contribution rates of 14.5% and 6.1% respectively. We agree to make a formal request to the USS Trustee that the new required contribution rate is implemented for employers and members from 1 January 2024.

Benefit Augmentation

In recognition of the significant improvement in the scheme’s reported funding position, and given the lower scheme benefits from April 2022, UCU and UUK have been exploring options and costs for augmenting benefits accrued between 1 April 2022 and 31 March 2024.

We agree that a one-off defined benefit (DB) pension augmentation should be given to scheme members2 with any service between 1 April 2022 and 31 March 2024. This pension will be increased each year in line with the USS standard pension increase (soft-cap), and will include the associated retirement lump sum and dependants’ benefits.

Subject to appropriate consultation processes by both UCU and UUK, we jointly propose that a one-off DB pension augmentation of £215 will be applied for all eligible members2, with an associated £645 retirement lump sum for active and deferred members. Pensioner members should receive an additional DB pension augmentation of £26, due to HMRC regulations concerning the payment of tax-free lump sums at retirement. These augmentation proposals will be effective as at 1 April 2024 and will be implemented as soon as possible thereafter.

Future Stability

Both UCU & UUK are committed to continuing to work together to ensure the stability of benefits and contributions at future valuations. This will include working to achieve a moderately prudent evidence-based valuation as a driver of stability in time for the next valuation, as well as investigating other approaches to ensure ongoing stability, such as an optimal investment strategy for an open, immature, and long-term scheme such as USS.

We reiterate our shared agreement to enhancing scheme governance. We will jointly explore options to make mutually acceptable adjustments to scheme design to further enhance stability of the scheme whilst retaining a predominantly defined benefit scheme.


Footnotes:

1  All defined benefits accrued between April 22 and April 24, existing or additional, will also be indexed at this rate, as will the defined benefit salary threshold.

2  A member who was active at any time during the period 01 April 2022 and 31 March 2024.


Our latest media statement, in reaction, is set out below:  

Commenting on the latest joint statement between Universities UK (UUK) on behalf of USS employers, and the University and College Union (UCU), representing scheme members, Vivienne Stern MBE, Chief Executive of Universities UK, said:

“We are delighted to have been able to agree on an outcome for the 2023 USS valuation which will be good for all members of the UK’s largest private pension scheme, and which will bring down costs for both members and employers. This has been possible largely as a result of dramatic changes in economic conditions since the last valuation, including high interest rates, combined with the commitment from employers for additional financial backing – or covenant support.

“When the scheme was in deficit in the past, we took steps to stabilise it. Now that it is in better shape, we are pleased that we can agree to pass on the benefits of the improved position through lower contributions and improved benefits. It is vitally important that we stabilise the scheme to avoid future fluctuations in its fortunes. The projected surplus in the scheme is an important protection, but we need to continue to work, with renewed momentum, towards arrangements which will provide longer term stability.”

ENDS


We will return to employers with a short consultation on the augmentation proposal, but in the meantime we would welcome any initial reaction to this agreement.

Our latest communications lines are shown below, which we hope will help employers to communicate with their staff on recent developments.

We will continue to keep you updated, as the valuation work progresses. As always, if you would like any further information regarding this update, please contact the UUK Pensions Team at pensions@universitiesuk.ac.uk.

Kind regards.

Sharon Moore, Head of Pensions

USS took its triennial valuation of the scheme earlier this year, and last week published its Technical Provisions consultation for employers. The data underpinning the assumptions of the consultation show a significantly improved financial outlook, providing an opportunity to improve benefits and potentially to reduce contributions significantly. We also hope that this year’s valuation activity will build more stability into the scheme. 

A consultation with employers is now underway.

You can read more on the USS employers site

Dame Kate Barker's, Chair of the USS Trustee Board, response to the UUK’s recent letter to the Trustee asking for a review of the Board’s decisions (that fed into the *Scheme Actuary’s 76.1 Report) submitted to the Joint Negotiating Committee on 2 March.

* The ’76.1 report’, is named after Rule 76.1 of the Scheme Rules. The report goes to the Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) – the body that represents members and employers – to help it decide what benefits the scheme will provide in the future, and how the cost should be shared between members and employers.

Universities UK (UUK) has written to the USS Trustee with a summary of employer responses to the 2020 valuation technical provisions consultation.

Responses were received from employers representing approximately 88% of the scheme’s active membership, and headline comments include:

  • The approach chosen by UUS Trustee for presenting its proposals is unhelpful and employers found it incredibly difficult to make sense of the consultation material.
  • The trustee’s covenant assessment, its proposed rule change and debt monitoring arrangements, and recovery plan need to be resolved before employers can make informed judgements on the valuation.
  • Further information is needed from the trustee on the wider perspective as many employers noted that it was impossible to answer questions in isolation, and these should be looked at within a more comprehensive picture

The full response is available to download on the USS Employers website.

The Trustee of USS has today launched a consultation with Universities UK (UUK) on key aspects of the pension scheme’s 2020 valuation.

USS is the UK’s largest private pension fund, and one of only a small number of defined benefit (DB) pension schemes still open to accrual in the UK outside the government sector.

The trustee company’s consultation covers the proposed methodology and assumptions to be used in setting the scheme’s ‘technical provisions’. This will, in turn, determine the contributions required to fund the benefits promised to its members by employers in the UK’s Higher Education (HE) sector.

The consultation document, and supporting papers, are available on the USS website.

In response to the request from Stuart McLean dated 9 May 2019 on the 2018 valuation contribution options University of Oxford’s initial preference was for Option 3.

The University would like to record its view that the timeline for the initial response put undue time pressure on employers, particularly institutions like Oxford with consultative governance arrangements, to formulate a considered view on such a complex matter. Oxford continues to support the work of JEP, now entering phase 2, and hopes and expects that all their work-streams will contribute to USS valuations, benefits, and contribution decisions that are more widely acceptable and trusted.

However, the University’s USS Working Group has further debated the options presented and the University is prepared to support option 3 as the least worst outcome of the three options presented. Option 3 provides some stability, at lower levels of contribution compared to the alternatives, to enable JEP phase 2 to complete and inform the methods and responses to the planned 2020 valuation.

 

The first report from the Joint Expert Panel set up by Universities UK (UUK) and the University and College Union (UCU) has been published. You may remember that the Panel’s agreed purpose is to: 

  • make an assessment of the 2017 valuation of the USS fund
  • focus in particular on reviewing the basis of the scheme valuation, assumptions and associated tests
  • agree key principles to underpin the future joint  approach of UUK and UCU to the valuation of the USS fund

The information from UUK below provides a link to the full report.

The Panel is recommending four areas where adjustments to the pension valuation should be considered:

A re-evaluation of the employers’ attitude to risk, which would result in a re-evaluation of the reliance on the sponsor covenant.

  1. Adopting a greater consistency of approach between the 2014 and 2017 valuations, which affects the scale and timing of deficit recovery contributions.
  2. Ensuring fairness and equality between generations of scheme members by smoothing future service contributions.
  3. Ensuring the valuation uses the most recently available information which means taking account of recent market improvements, new investment considerations and the latest data on mortality, for example.

A key sentence in the report says:  “The level of benefits is a matter for the stakeholders to negotiate. However, it is the Panel’s belief, based on independent actuarial analysis, that the full implementation of these adjustments could mean total required contributions estimated at 29.2% to fund current benefits (minus the 1% match). This compares to the current rate of 26% (18% of salary paid by employers, 8% by employees) and the rate of 36.6% from April 2020 which is proposed by USS, based on the valuation as it stands.”

Please note that consultation on 76.4 (the legal mechanism in the USS rules which allows USS to impose a valuation on universities if no decision is reached between employers’ and employees’ representatives) continues but may be superseded by the outcome of negotiations based on these recommendations.

Information from UUK 

The full report and an executive summary can be found here.

The Panel was set up by the University and College Union (UCU) and UUK in the light of industrial dispute earlier this year over USS. 

The JEP has undertaken a retrospective review of the 2017 actuarial valuation, including an assessment of the methodology, assumptions and processes underpinning the valuation. In its report the Panel has then gone on to explore the scope for possible adjustments to various elements of the valuation which the panel believes would allow it to be concluded.  A number of related observations and recommendations have been included in the panel’s report.

UUK is pleased to receive the JEP’s independent analysis of the valuation. The JEP was established to help in building confidence, trust and increased transparency in the valuation process, and we hope by this report that those objectives have been met.  We also believe that it will assist in creating the space for UCU and UUK to find common ground to conclude the 2017 valuation.

Next week, UUK plans to start the process of consultation with all USS employers on their views on the Panel’s recommendations, to inform talks with UCU and the USS Trustee. This will include examining employers’ willingness to accept greater levels of risk, and to pay more into the scheme than the current employer contribution of 18% of salary.

UUK believes that potential responses include employers taking on greater levels of risk, stakeholders paying higher contributions, the USS Trustee updating the valuation assumptions and stakeholders agreeing some moderate adjustment to benefits. Any solution is likely to require a combination of these and must be consistent with the statutory and regulatory duties of the USS Trustee and the Pensions Regulator.

The publication of the JEP report does not alter the status of the current consultation by employers on the Trustee’s cost-sharing proposals which is ongoing and due to conclude on 2 November.

Update 30 July 2018: Email to all USS members from the Director of Human Resources

We updated you earlier this month that the USS pension scheme trustees intended to propose contribution increases from both employers and employees.

The USS trustees have now published details, which will be consulted on, of how the proposed increases would be implemented in phases from April onwards next year. As you know, Universities UK and the Universities and College Union are separately discussing the USS scheme valuation, which may lead to alternative proposals being agreed later in the year. However, for the moment, the USS is legally obliged to bring forward proposals based on the existing valuation. The trustees have said these contributions are necessary to maintain current pension benefits for staff and to meet the requirements set by the Pensions Regulator.

Under existing cost sharing rules agreed by UUK and UCU, the University, as the employer, is obliged to pay 65% of any increase and employees the remaining 35%. The trustees are proposing the following contribution rates:

 

 

From   1 April 2019

From   1 October 2019

From   1 April 2020

Member   rate

8.8%

10.4%

11.7%

Employer   rate

19.5%

22.5%

24.9%

You can find further details from the USS trustees here. There is more information on what these proposals mean for you, including worked examples on the University’s pensions website here. There is also a Q and A here explaining why the USS has to take this step now.

We would stress again that the joint UUK and UCU discussions may overtake these proposals. They may not be implemented, or only introduced temporarily. However, as they stand, the proposed contributions would obviously present a challenge for members of staff and for the University.

The University has a duty to consult fully with staff on these USS proposals. Details on consultation sessions and online survey arrangements will be circulated shortly. In the meantime, if you have any questions or comments on the USS announcement, please do raise them for discussion with Council members via the University’s online pensions forum.

The JNC resolved to revoke its 23 January resolution on benefit reform. The USS Trustee had requested that the JNC make its position known by 30 April.  

The USS trustee has indicated that they are minded to take forward Rule 76.4-8. This allows for the imposition of increased costs on employers and scheme members and the trustee has indicated they will work towards implementing this from 1 April 2019. This would enable the trustee to be in a position to demonstrate compliance with its statutory responsibilities and accountabilities to the Pensions Regulator.  UUK is seeking urgently clarification on the Rule 76.4-8 process before it commences.

The USS consultation closed at 2pm today. The result was as follows:

Total balloted: 53,415

Total votes cast: 33,973

Total number valid votes: 33,913

Turnout: 63.5%

Yes to accept the UUK offer 21,683 (64%)

No to reject the UUK offer 12,230 (36%)

In line with the decision of members the union will suspend its immediate industrial action plans but keep our legal strike mandate live until the agreement between UCU and UUK is noted by USS.

Response from Universities UK on behalf of employers including Oxford University:

'The decision by UCU members to support the creation of a Joint Expert Panel means that strike action is immediately suspended. This gives students important reassurance that they won’t be affected by further disruption during their summer study and exam period.

'Reviewing the methodology and assumptions in the current valuation will build confidence, trust and increase transparency in the valuation process. It will provide an opportunity to consider the questions raised about the valuation by scheme members and employers. It is important that interested parties engage with the panel and remain open-minded about its possible findings.

'Working in partnership with UCU, we will now appoint a jointly agreed chair for the panel as soon as possible before developing its terms of reference, order of work and timescales.

'Alongside UCU, we will seek support for this process from USS and the Pensions Regulator, fully recognising their statutory responsibilities and accountabilities. Current pension benefits are guaranteed until 1 April 2019, so the panel will need to conclude its work in time to put in place a sustainable way forward for USS from that date.'

UUK has issued a statement on risk in response to concerns about the underlying assumptions of the valuation with the aim of restoring public confidence (Related Documents). UUK has undertaken to convene an independent expert group.

USS has published some new information on the 2017 valuation, addressing myths and misconceptions that have taken hold.

There is strong support amongst employers for the reform proposal jointly developed at ACAS. UUK is currently mapping out a range of options and considering how best to proceed. UUK must ensure that the employer position taken forward reflects the latest position for the majority of employers. Although the ACAS proposal would mean higher contributions for employers (at 19.3% of salaries) and for employees (at 8.7% of salaries), it offers a viable alternative to maintain defined benefit pensions for this valuation.   UUK continues to seek a resolution to this dispute to avoid further strike action and more disruption to students' education. UUK is contacting UCU to better understand the reaction from their branch Presidents to the ACAS proposal. Clearly we all want to see an end to the current disruptive industrial action, however it must also be recognised that it is not clear at the moment what would be acceptable for UCU in terms of trying to reach a negotiated settlement to this dispute.   In addition, the Pensions Regulator today signalled to UUK that it is reviewing the ACAS proposal and is likely to provide a view next week. They highlighted their concern about ‘any further dilution’ of the ACAS proposal and the risk that would entail for the scheme.   As well as talking further with UCU, in the coming days we are seeking to hold an Employers Pensions Forum meeting and an extraordinary UUK Board meeting to review the employer position.   Valuation UUK is making arrangements to establish the independent expert group on valuation as soon as possible. This will have an independent chair, involve academics and pension professionals, and liaise with both USS and the Pensions Regulator. The group will consider issues of methodology, assumptions and monitoring, aiming to promote greater transparency and understanding, and will take account of the real strengths, sustainability and viability of the scheme.   Removing the indexation cap from the proposal developed at ACAS We have received correspondence today suggesting amending the proposal to include the scheme’s current levels of indexation and thought it would be helpful to share information about the costs involved. This change would require a further increase of c2.5% in contributions beyond those increases included in the ACAS proposal, split 65%/35% between employers and scheme members. This would take employer contributions to c21% of salaries. This change would also increase the risk in the scheme which could potentially be a concern for the Pensions Regulator.

Key Points:

  • The future of university pensions is a matter of law. The Pensions Regulator has a responsibility to ensure the security of pensions, for the sake of all members. Employers must act in the interests of current and future members, to ensure existing pensions are secure and future pensions sustainable and attractive.
  • The challenges facing USS are not unique and are challenges that have been faced by many other defined benefit (DB) schemes.
  • Talks between Universities UK and UCU began in January 2017 and since then employers have put forward two proposals that secure the sustainability of members' pensions. Neither proposal was deemed acceptable by UCU.
  • Employers have listened to the concerns that UCU set out on behalf of their members and compromised. Employers have proposed to increase contributions to the scheme to maintain meaningful defined benefits. The proposal jointly developed with UCU negotiators at ACAS would ensure that more than 50% of USS members retain full DB benefits.
  • Given the concerns about how the scheme has been valued, we will establish an independent, expert group to examine the valuation assumptions which will report back as soon as possible.
  • Faced with the prospect of employers and member representatives failing to agree necessary reforms, then the USS Trustee Board would have no option but to raise contribution requirements in line with the costs of current benefit accrual, without undue delay. This would mean that USS triggers automatic increases in salary contributions of c11%, split 65%/35% between employers and staff.
  • All universities want an urgent, affordable solution to end this dispute which is having a damaging impact on students and staff.

The provisional agreement reached at ACAS on revised benefit proposals was not agreed by UCU’s Higher Education Committee (HEC) and consequently was not put to a Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) meeting.  As a result the decision of the JNC in January still stands, but the planned employer consultation on these proposals remains on hold until we receive further notice.  The consultation will therefore not commence in the week beginning 19 March 2018.

Following more than a week of intensive ACAS talks between UUK and UCU, negotiators have agreed the terms of a new joint proposal to address the latest USS valuation. The agreed text of the full proposal is available from the right-hand column of this page (Related Documents).  The agreement includes a solution to the current valuation and recognises the work needed to put the scheme on a sustainable footing for the future.

The proposal sets out a process whereby UCU would suspend industrial action from and including Wednesday 14 March. In addition, UUK has today asked USS to suspend the member consultation on the previous JNC proposal, which was due to commence on 19 March.

USS trustee provided an update on the valuation, highlighting six things that USS members should know about the valuation https://www.uss.co.uk/how-uss-is-run/valuation/an-urgent-update-from-the-trustee.

Universities UK has issued an open letter detailing its position on the dispute over pensions (see related documents).  It has reported that progress had been made in talks with UCU. http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/news/Pages/Progress-made-at-USS-talks.aspx

A decision on proposed benefit reform has been reached by the USS Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) with the JNC’s independent chair voting in favour of a revised employer proposal tabled by Universities UK (UUK).  UUK’s statement on the proposed benefit reform gives details of the proposal and the background on the need for change to address the funding deficit in USS.  In summary the proposal is:

Employer contributions - Employers will continue to pay a contribution of 18% of salaries towards USS, and it is proposed that this important commitment is extended from March 2020 to March 2023.

Member contributions - Members will continue to pay 8% of salaries towards USS.  A new option is being proposed which would allow members to pay less (4% is proposed), whilst still benefitting from the full employer contribution of 18%.

Main benefit change - The JNC proposal is to change USS so that members earn defined contribution (DC) benefits on all of their salary from April 2019. Currently DC benefits are only earned on salary over £55,550, with defined benefits (DB) earned on salary below the threshold.

DC and DB benefits are quite distinct, and both have their advantages. In a DC scheme, members have individual saving pots (or funds) that both they and their employer pay into. At retirement, members draw their pension savings from their fund which consists of all of the contributions paid in plus the investment returns that have been earned. They can then choose whether they wish to take out all their retirement savings as a lump sum, or to opt for alternative options such as a pension (known as an annuity) or drawdown (where cash is drawn from the fund periodically).

More information on the difference between DB and DC pension benefits can be found on Universities UK’s website.

As at 19 December 2017, the JNC had not reached a decision.  UUK and UCU representatives have agreed formally to reconvene on 23 January 2018.

The USS trustee board has considered the implications of this.  As explained in the USS valuation update available at https://www.uss.co.uk/how-uss-is-run/valuation/2017-valuation-updates/update-on-the-2017-valuation-funding-review the trustee board has taken steps to ensure that the valuation is completed by deadline of 30 June 2017 and triggered the default cost sharing arrangement to support the current benefits.

SECTION THREE: Oxford's responses and joint statements

How the University has responded to consultations and addressed concerns related to the scheme.

title 5

Professor Louise Richardson, Vice-Chancellor of the University of Oxford, Professor Stephen Toope, Vice-Chancellor of the University of Cambridge, and Professor Alice P. Gast, President of Imperial College London, are co-signatories on a letter sent today to the Group Chief Executive Officer for USS, Mr Bill Galvin. The letter details their concerns regarding a number of significant proposed changes to the current USS investment strategy, as well as asking for clarification from USS on a number of key questions as part of the formal consultation.

Read the open letter

The University cannot endorse UCU’s proposal as it stands because this would require signing up to a schedule of future contributions that over time would go beyond affordable levels. As noted in previous consultation responses, the University is willing to consider higher contributions than the current level but not on the scale that the University would be committed to under this proposal. If a future USS valuation reveals an improved position then the University would like to see consideration given to improving benefits rather than contributions reduced.

The University remains keen to see progress on fundamental reform of the scheme governance by building on the JEP recommendations and on exploring more imaginative scheme designs such as Conditional Indexation, which have the potential to provide superior benefits at a given cost.

USS members at the University of Oxford submitted 140 responses to the consultation directly through the USS website and 7 responses directly to the University. You can read a summary of Oxford's response to the consultation here.

Conditional indexation and USS: both universities and their UCU branches call for working together to explore a new scheme design for USS that could lead to a much enhanced benefit structure

We, the undersigned, consider that a contribution rate of 25-30% of salary should be sufficient to secure a good pension for staff who are members of the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS).

However, we believe that the current regulatory and actuarial approach to risk for traditional defined benefit schemes – including the current USS scheme – makes it difficult to obtain good value for money. Successive valuations have locked in higher contribution rates and/or reduced benefits for a scheme that can afford to operate under a very long-term investment horizon. Members see their benefits eroded on the basis that something bad – but ultimately unlikely – might happen (USS will not be able to make good on its future pension promises) but see little flexibility in the scheme to benefit from improved market conditions. Absent a change to the current regulatory and actuarial approach, we believe this can only be achieved by redesigning the scheme. Moreover, until this happens, it is difficult to see an end to the problems that USS, its members and employers, have experienced since at least 2016. The outcome of the 2020 valuation is likely to do little to address these underlying issues and break out of this cycle.

We therefore seek to build on the benefits of engagement between UUK and UCU since the last valuation via the Joint Expert Panel and Valuation Methodology Discussion Forum. Scheme design and valuation need to start with the assumption that USS will invest in the assets that will deliver the best overall return over the long term, without excessive concern for volatility along the way (much like a university endowment). This should provide the best pensions for members with the lowest overall level of contributions. We should only move away from this efficient, long-term portfolio if it can be demonstrated under plausible scenarios that the scheme will be unable to pay benefits, and then only when other mechanisms to manage the risks identified (such as affordable employer and member risk and reward sharing) have proven to be unworkable.

At present, USS uses a standard, and overly simplistic approach to risk that may be appropriate for single employer closed schemes but is not appropriate for USS. Employers and members need to work together with a well-resourced and transparent USS management to optimise the scheme and find ways to manage risk that do not over-rely on the ‘gap to self-sufficiency’ measure. USS should focus on how the scheme would actually manage its risk in various downside scenarios. This should be overseen by a trustee board with expertise in maximising long-term returns.

This approach to valuation is fundamentally different from the current scheme design and the recent UUK proposal. Under this alternative, scheme members would obtain better pensions in the vast majority of expected outcomes.

We therefore reiterate the need to explore an alternative scheme design as quickly as possible to provide a good pension for 25-30% of salary. We recognise that developing a new scheme is a complex process with a number of design and regulatory issues to be addressed and the timeframe is too short to implement such a solution for the 2020 valuation. However, we think that a team mobilised rapidly to explore the options could allow any benefit reductions/increased costs that flow from the current valuation process to be in place for the minimum amount of time.

We therefore ask USS, UUK and UCU to put together a fully resourced team to investigate alternative scheme design based on employer and member risk and reward sharing. We briefly illustrate below how this might be achieved using conditional indexation. This team should report on progress and emerging potential options within six months.

Michael Abberton, President, Cambridge UCU branch

Dr David Chivall, President, Oxford UCU branch

Professor Louise Richardson, Vice-Chancellor, University of Oxford

Professor Stephen J Toope, Vice-Chancellor, University of Cambridge


Conditional indexation: how it could work

Conditional indexation is a form of pension scheme design where members share some of the risk (and reward) of changes in asset performance. This can allow pensions to be provided for a lower overall contribution level than is needed under traditional defined benefit schemes where trustees consider the extent to which the scheme itself could bear all of the risk of employer failure, and typically build extremely high levels of prudence into their calculations.

Under a conditional indexation scheme, new benefits would continue to accrue as now. Taking accrual rates currently in place in USS as an example, an employee earning £37,500 would receive a pension in retirement of £500 a year (1/75 th) for each year worked (and £1500 lump sum on retirement).

However, the benefit would not – as it does now – automatically increase with inflation until retirement. Instead, increases will be conditional on market performance – within defined parameters that should protect members from significantly deleterious outcomes. If financial market conditions turn out to be broadly as expected, then the benefit would increase with inflation. If market conditions were materially worse than expected, the benefit would not increase at all. And if market conditions were materially better than expected, the benefit would increase by more than inflation. Once the benefit had increased by inflation, it could not be decreased again.

Conditional indexation would apply to new benefit accrual only. Benefits earned in USS to date would continue to increase with inflation according to the scheme’s existing rules. After retirement, all benefits must by law increase at the lesser of CPI inflation or 2.5% per year. Therefore, after retirement, benefits would increase by a minimum of CPI inflation or 2.5% per year, but might increase by more than that if market conditions were materially better than expected (i.e. conditional indexation adjustments would still apply, but with a ‘floor’ of 2.5%/CPI).

Over the medium-long term, we would expect benefits to appreciate as much or more under this approach as in the current inflation-linked scheme. The investment in a diverse mix of long-term growth assets should protect against the erosion of benefits even in conditions of high market volatility such as the high-inflation 1970s. Of course, in finalizing the design of the scheme, extensive modelling should be undertaken to demonstrate that the probability of a material reduction in pension compared to CPI indexation is low.

It would also be important that scheme design ensures USS continues to invest a significant proportion of the fund in growth assets and that there is not the discretion for the trustee to withhold indexation out of a desire (without clear justification) to increase the level of prudence in the scheme.

The University's final response to the USS 2020 Valuation Consultation has now been submitted.

uss_2020_consultation_-_oxford_universitys_response_october.pdf

USS 2020 valuation – methodology and assumptions for technical provisions
Consultation response from the University of Oxford

Status of response

The following response was prepared by the working group set up by the University’s Council to consider USS matters, it has been discussed by Council and will be updated and submitted on October 30th once consultation with colleagues is complete and it has been approved by Council.

Overview

Before responding to this consultation, we would like to highlight a more fundamental issue in terms of the funding regime to which USS is subject.  USS is supported by the covenant of higher education sector institutions with several decades and in some cases several centuries of “credit history” and the scheme’s cash inflows are expected to exceed outflows for many years into the future.  We believe that these two features mean that USS bears a greater resemblance to schemes such as the Teachers’ Pension Scheme than to the private sector schemes for whom the current funding and regulatory regimesare designed.

As one of the largest employers participating in USS, we remain committed to the scheme and believe it is the right pension arrangement for the higher education sector in the UK.  In our opinion, the greatest threat to the scheme is that members will lose confidence in its stability, affordability and intergenerational fairness, leading to a sharp increase in drop-out rates.  We believe there is a way forward within the current framework and in line with the recommendations of the Joint Expert Panel (JEP) that would be affordable for both employers and members. A pre-retirement discount rate of gilts+3.5% or higher and a recovery period of 15-20 years with allowance for outperformance are two JEP recommendations that would produce much more affordable outcomes.

Response to consultation

The University is disappointed that USS has chosen to consult on the technical provisions in isolation from other aspects of the valuation.

Although we understand that this consultation does not formally include details of the recovery plan, we are also disappointed by the range of potential contributions USS has chosen to set out, all of which are above the affordability levels previously communicated by USS employers and members.The consultation document states that USS, “aim to make the cost of funding new pensions as sustainable as possible,” but this stated objective is not borne out in the document that follows it.  We believe that this disconnect between objective and text risks undermining employers’ and members’ confidence in USS and risks undermining their engagement in the valuation process.  For example:

  • we have already had feedback from some of our members that USS represents poor value or is failing – this reaction may well lead to further members opting out of the scheme in circumstances where the current rate of opt out is already a concern;
  • employers may now see little incentive to engage with further consultations on debt monitoring, paripassu or the proposed rule change, since even with these in place the scheme appears unaffordable.

Consistent with our responses to previous consultations, the University remainssupportive of the recommendations set out by the JEP and of the work of the Valuation Methodology Discussion Forum (VMDF).  We are pleased to see that some JEP recommendations have been reflected in the technical provisions consultation.  In particular, the adoption of dual discount rates is a positive step; we understand this methodology change would have avoided contribution increases if it had been adopted for the 2018 valuation.  However, we believe that the affordability of the scheme relies on the adoption of two further JEP recommendations regarding pre-retirement discount rates and deficit recovery period.

Pre-retirement discount rate

With a “strong” covenant, the consultation document suggests that the highest pre‑retirement discount rate that would be acceptable to the USS trustee would be gilts+3.5%.  Even allowing for a reduced allocation to return-seeking assets of 55%, gilts+3.5% represents a 78% confidence level.  This seems unnecessarily high in the context of the strongest possible covenant.

Gilts+3.5% was the highest of the three pre-retirement discount rates set out by the JEP.  However, that was in the context of financial conditions at the time, and without any additional covenant measures in place.

The JEP recommended that the pre-retirement discount rate be expressed as a fixed margin above CPI inflation, rather than above gilt yields.  Since the JEP report was published in December 2019, gilt yields have fallen by around 0.5% pa relative to CPI inflation.  As such, gilts+3.5% would now represent the middle of the range set out by the JEP with scope for a higher rate to be adopted.  The range should then increase further if additional covenant measures are agreed.  USS therefore needs to justify why, against the views of the JEP, it considers that a pre-retirement discount rate higher than gilts+3.5% would not be acceptable.

Please also note that we do not agree with USS’ view that the adoption of a dual discount rate approach should lead to a reduction in the allocation to return-seeking assets.

Recovery plan length

Whilst we acknowledge that this consultation does not include the recovery plan, we consider it unhelpful to have shown recovery periods of eight and ten years.  The lowest level of deficit contributions illustrated using thisrecovery period is 11.9% – even at this level, the amount the sector could reasonably afford in addition would not provide an acceptable level of future benefit accrual (whether that was DB or DC in nature).

The JEP recommended a recovery period of 15-20 years with some allowance for investment outperformance.  We also note that both the 2017 and 2014 valuations were concluded on the basis of a 17 year recovery period.  We believe that a recovery period of this duration would go a long way towards securing affordability of contributions without unduly compromising the prudence of the scheme.

Valuation timing

We strongly disagree that decisions on the long-term future of USS can be made in the context of what are extraordinary circumstances in the global economy.  The UK Treasury has cancelled this autumn’s budget noting that “now is not the right time to outline long-term plans”, yet there is a danger that that is exactly what we are heading towards with USS.  In particular, current interest rates reflect a significant level of government intervention, and it is therefore improbable that the long-term rates implied will continue over the time horizons considered in this consultation document . Decision making in the midst of such market dislocation risks proving to be thoroughly reckless.

We appreciate that a decision was reached earlier in the year to proceed with the 2020 valuation, but in light of a further six months’ experience it is essential that USS reconsiders this and sets out the implications of delaying the valuation until 2021.

 

 

This is the second part in a series of planned consultations intended to gather the views of employers on the JEP’s recommendations, and to understand how these might be implemented in the context of the 2020 valuation and in supporting the longer-term sustainability of USS.

A draft response prepared by the USS Working Group was shared with scheme members for additional comments from 26 March to 14 April. 

The final response to the second consultation is now available to view online. 

In addition to the series of consultations relating to the 2020 valuation, UUK recently carried out a separate consultation on USS’s proposals for the monitoring of debt levels in the sector.  The introduction of a debt monitoring framework was agreed in principle as part of the 2018 valuation.  UUK established a working group to work with USS on the details, and this consultation is the first opportunity for USS employers to provide feedback on the proposals shared by USS last month.

The University’s response to this consultation is now available to view online

A draft response prepared by the USS Working Group was shared with the affected staff for additional comments. The final response to the first consultation is now available to view online

It is part of a series of planned consultations intended to gather the views of employers on the JEP’s recommendations, and to understand how these might be implemented in the context of the 2020 valuation and in supporting the longer-term sustainability of USS.

The additional USS statutory consultation, on salary threshold, will run until 5pm on Monday 23 March 2020. 

The University of Oxford has considered the material from UUK issued on 23 August with a short timescale to indicate its views to UUK by close of business on 9 September on a revised Schedule of Contributions required to conclude the 2018 actuarial valuation.

The University would like to emphasise its repeated concerns that extremely short timescales for consultations issued in 2018/19 put at risk the common objective of reaching a settlement which works for the Pensions Regulator, the Trustees, member employers and employees alike. The complexity of both subject and governance, together with the materiality and term of the implications for member employees and employers, mean that clear communication and consultation are essential.

The University reiterates its support for the views of the Joint Expert Panel and its wishes for a period of stability to allow for the second phase of its work (JEP2) to be concluded and given full consideration.  On this basis, the University reiterates the view expressed in previous consultation responses: that the schedule of contributions set out in Option 3 represents the “least worst” route to both the conclusion of the 2018 actuarial valuation and to the refocussing of the whole sector on the work of JEP2.

However, in recommending Option 3 as the “least worst” route to conclusion of this 2018 valuation, the University would like to draw the attention to two areas in which the Schedule of Contributions based on the 2018 valuation vary fundamentally from the JEP recommendations. These points of inconsistency have material implications for the contribution rates of 23.7% and 11.0% proposed for 1 October 2021 and as such need to be addressed as a matter of urgency by JEP2 in advance of the 2020 valuation.

  1.             The length of the proposed Recovery Plan

The Schedule of Contributions set out in the consultation assumes a Recovery Plan (ie elimination of the scheme’s deficit) of 10 years from March 2018. This length of 10 years is significantly shorter than the 15 years included in the 2014 valuation which the Pensions Regulator agreed. The Joint Expert Panel also recommended a deficit recovery period of 15-20 years. Given that the value of employee and employer contributions is determined by both the value of the deficit and the period over which that deficit is to be recovered, the University will continue to represent to JEP2 the view represented to JEP: that the combined contribution rate of 34.7% scheduled to apply from October 1 2021 is overstated and the shorter length of the recovery plan must be addressed as part of the 2020 valuation to bring it in line with the JEP recommendation and the 2014 valuation.

  1.             Expected asset outperformance and gilt yields

The Schedule of Contributions set out in the consultation assumes no asset outperformance and a fixed relationship between the yields available on gilts and other investment types. These valuation assumptions are not consistent with the JEP recommendations and have the effect of building into future years the historically low gilt yields observed over the last 8-10 years, thereby increasing the contributions required over the Recovery Plan to eliminate the deficit. Equally, these valuation assumptions are inconsistent with the 2014 valuation which the Pensions Regulator agreed.

The University will continue to represent to JEP2 the view represented to JEP: that these valuation assumptions have the effect of overstating the combined rate schedule to apply from October 1 2021 and must be addressed as part of the 2020 valuation.

In noting the proposed Schedule of Contributions, the University is prioritising the closure of the 2018 valuation and the opportunity for JEP2 to progress a sensible and timely approach to the 2020 valuation. The University is doing so In the expectation that JEP2 will determine fresh approaches to the 2020 valuation that do not result in the outlined 2021 contribution rates.

The 2018 actuarial valuation and the provision of contingent support

The University is pleased to respond to UUK’s consultation on the 2018 actuarial valuation and the provision of contingent support. The University understands that UUK will prepare a collective response on behalf of employers when responding to the USS Trustee’s:

  • Consultation on the proposed Technical Provisions and Statement of Funding Principles for the 2018 actuarial valuation dated 21 December 2018;
  • Invitation for UUK, in consultation with employers, to propose a contingent contributions arrangement that they feel able to support (following the USS Trustee’s decision not to propose a contingent contribution arrangement that it would be willing to accept).

This response has been prepared by a USS Review Working Group set up by Oxford University Council to consider the funding and benefits of the USS. In reaching its views, the USS Review Working Group has sought specialist advice from independent actuaries.

Formal consultation response

UUK has invited employers to respond to their consultation by expressing views on the following three specific questions to which we provide our response.

  1. 1.    Do you have any specific comments on the proposed assumptions for the 2018 valuation, including views on the proposed upper bookend and lower bookend?

The University’s overarching view is that the proposals put forward by the JEP had the support of both the employers’ and employees’ representatives and should be acceptable to the USS Trustee without the need for contingent support. Therefore, the University does not agree with the proposed assumptions for the upper bookend which makes no adjustment for any of the JEP proposals. The University supports UUK in its proposal to ask the USS Trustee why they take a different view to the JEP that contingent support (other than that already available to them) is required now before any of the JEP proposals can be implemented or phase 2 of the JEP completed.

Even without any of the JEP proposals being factored into the 2018 valuation the University notes that the upper bookend assumptions result in the deficit reducing from £7.5Bn to £3.6Bn with no apparent reduction to the deficit contributions (which appear to remain at 5%). The University does not support this approach to setting deficit contributions and believes an approach consistent to that used for the 2017 valuation should be adopted (i.e. similar recovery plan end-date and outperformance allowance) with consideration given to what employers can reasonably afford over the longer term.

The University would also point out that the upper bookend assumptions assume that de-risking starts immediately following the valuation (rather than being deferred 10 years, as was assumed in the 2014 valuation and recommended by the JEP) and that maintaining deficit contributions at 5% at a time when risk/volatility is being reduced and the deficit has halved is inappropriate. 

Whilst the lower bookend allows for some, but not all, of the JEP proposals the University could accept the assumptions proposed for the lower bookend which produces a deficit of £2.2bn and an overall contribution rate of 29.7% as an interim step until the JEP completes its phase 2 review.

  1. 2.    Do you support UUK putting forward a proposal for a CCs arrangement to the USS Trustee as it requested? If not, would you prefer to pay at the upper bookend level, or what would your preferred response be?

No. The University does not believe that a CCs arrangement is needed to support the lower bookend position. The University believes that the levers already available to the USS Trustee allow sufficient flexibility to control the contributions payable to the USS during a period of sustained deterioration in the funding level. The added complexity (and monitoring costs) associated with a CCs arrangement, that would require further consultation with members on rule changes, would be premature given the intention of the JEP to consider CCs arrangements as part of its phase 2 review.

 As discussed in our response to question 1, the University does not believe it is appropriate to pay the upper bookend level, as defined by USS, given the reduction in the deficit from the 2017 valuation (i.e. from £7.5Bn to £3.6Bn using the upper bookend assumptions). The USS Trustee’s proposal to maintain deficit contributions at 5% regardless of the improvement in the funding position appears to reduce the recovery plan length by c5-7 years (compared to the 2017 valuation) and the University does not agree with this approach.

If the USS Trustee insists on using the upper bookend assumptions the University asks that UUK negotiate for lower deficit contributions by adopting a recovery plan which is more consistent with that agreed following the 2017 valuation (i.e. in terms of recovery plan assumptions and length) – as put forward by the UUK proposal.

  1. 3.    Do you find the proposal for a CCs arrangement set out in the Aon note acceptable, taking all factors into account? If not, what aspects would you wish to change?

If a CCs arrangement were to be imposed on the University (for example, due to the majority of employers wanting to offer the USS Trustee a CCs arrangement) the proposed arrangement put forward by Aon on behalf of UUK has some merit provided:

  • Any rule change required to allow implementation of a CCs arrangement would be time-limited to only be applicable until the next Schedule of Contributions is signed;
  • There is no commitment to any future CCs arrangement being maintained after completion of the next formal actuarial valuation (due in either 2020 or 2021);
  • It would be reviewed as part of the work to be undertaken by the JEP in phase 2 of their review and that the outcome of the JEPs phase 2 review would inform the next valuation;
  • Technical Provisions (or a close proxy to them), not a self-sufficiency basis, would be used as the trigger metric; and
  • The timetable/methodology proposed for by Aon for determining whether a trigger point is breached (i.e. covering frequency of monitoring, smoothing and the period over which a breach must be maintained) is taken forward.

We hope this response will assist UUK in its negotiations with the USS Trustee in relation to the 2018 actuarial valuation.

For the University of Oxford
Council's USS Working Group

12 March 2019

Proposal to finalise the 2017 actuarial valuation

The University is pleased, via UUK, to share its views on the USS trustee company’s proposals to conclude the 2017 actuarial valuation of the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS).

This response has been prepared by a USS Review Working Group set up by University Council to consider the funding and benefits of the USS. In reaching its views, the USS Review Working Group has sought specialist advice from independent actuaries.

Formal consultation

The University is appreciative of the material produced by the USS and UUK to help conclude the 2017 actuarial valuation. The University understands that formal consultation for the conclusion of the 2017 actuarial valuation began on 5 December 2018 and will conclude on 11 January 2019.

General comments

The University had hoped that the 2017 valuation could be concluded without having to introduce significant stepped increases to employee and employer contributions from March 2019. However, the University recognises the need to complete the 2017 valuation following prolonged valuation negotiations and consultations. We also recognise that the cost-sharing provisions under Rules 76.4-8 need to be implemented to conclude the valuation and submit the required legislative documents to the Pensions Regulator. After reviewing the documents, the University has the following points we should like to make clear:

  • The USS Trustee could credibly accept deficit recovery contributions lower than the proposed 6%, with the continued inclusion additional investment performance as assumed in the previous valuation. 
  • The USS trustee should not give undue weighting to short-term market movements, given the long-term nature of the scheme and its covenant. 

The University has no further comments on the proposed Schedule of Contributions or Recovery Plan other that noting that the University views these documents as an interim step before a new valuation can be undertaken.

In this regard the University welcomes the agreement from USS to undertake an actuarial valuation as at 31 March 2018 and would hope that the outcome of the 2018 valuation, in considering the points raised by the JEP, results in more favourable contribution outcomes for both employees and employers compared to the 2017 valuation. In particular, following completion of the 2018 valuation, the University would hope that the significant contribution increases currently expected (from 1 October 2019 and 1 April 2020) could be avoided but note the concerns raised recently by the Pensions Regulator.

We hope this response will assist UUK in finalising the 2017 actuarial valuation with the USS Trustee.

For the University of Oxford
Council's USS Working Group

11 January 2019

The rules of the University Superannuation Scheme (USS) include a default cost sharing process for dealing with circumstances where an actuarial valuation reveals an increase in the employers’ aggregate contribution is required and the Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) does not decide how to respond to it. Under the cost sharing process, the increased cost of providing the scheme’s benefits is addressed through cost sharing between members and employers – revising the contributions payable to the scheme so that they provide the required level of funding. The proposed changes to the scheme are “listed changes” for the purposes of The Occupational and Personal Pension Schemes (Consultation by Employers and Miscellaneous Amendment) Regulations 2006 (as amended for multi-employer schemes), so a statutory consultation with affected employees and their representatives (Oxford UCU) has been undertaken by the University as employer.

Read more.

The Equality Impact Assessment (EIA) document on proposed reforms to the USS is also available here.

USS Review Working Group:  A consultation by Universities UK with USS’s participating employers on the Joint Expert Panel recommendation

The University’s Council has established the USS Review Working Group ("the Group").  One of the roles of the Group is to respond to consultations from Universities UK on behalf of the University of Oxford.

The Group met on 25 September 2018 to consider, amongst other matters, the Report of the Joint Expert Panel issued on 13 September 2018. 

The response drafted by the Group on behalf of the University, endorsed by Council, was submitted to UUK as follows:

  1.  Would your institution support the JEP recommendations regarding the 2017 valuation (see Table 2 - page 10), in overall terms, subject to the acceptance of such a position from the USS Trustee (and TPR as appropriate)?

Yes - subject to the acceptance of such a position from the USS Trustee (and TPR as appropriate)

 2.  What further information would you need to provide a final view for question 1?

None at this stage - given that we are being asked for a response on the summary of the JEP recommendations in table 2.  

 3.  Employers currently pay 18% towards the USS scheme, and the mandate agreed immediately following the Acas discussions was 19.3%. If the recommendations of the JEP were accepted in full by all parties, the outcome would be that existing benefits - minus the employer match of 1% - could be provided at an indicative employer contribution of 20.1% of salary (with a member contribution of 9.1%).

(a)     Would you accept employer contributions at that level?

(b)     If not, what balance of additional risk, higher contributions and/or benefit change would you prefer to see as an outcome?

(a)     Yes, through to the conclusion of the next valuation.

(b)     Not applicable